ShareThis Page

Though small by NHL standards, Crosby line putting up big numbers

| Thursday, March 16, 2017, 7:51 p.m.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
The Penguins' Sidney Crosby celebrates with Conor Sheary after Sheary's winning goal against the Sabres in the third period Sunday, March 5, 2017, at PPG Paints Arena.
Steph Chambers | Tribune-Review
The Penguins' Conor Sheary keeps the puck in the offensive zone against the Lightning on Friday, March 3, 2017, at PPG Paints Arena.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
The Penguins' Jake Guentzel sets up beside Sabres goaltender Andres Nilsson in the third period Sunday, March 5, 2017 at PPG Paints Arena.

When winger Tom Sestito's son was born last spring, Sidney Crosby wrote a personalized message on the blade of a stick as a gift to the infant and his parents.

“I felt a foot taller with your dad in the lineup,” Crosby wrote.

Know what else makes Crosby feel taller?

Playing with his current linemates.

For perhaps the first time in his career, the 5-foot-11 Crosby is the tallest member of his line. Right wing Conor Sheary is 5-8, and left wing Jake Guentzel, though listed at 5-11, is a little shorter than his centerman.

“I didn't ever think of that. I like it,” Crosby said with a grin before slipping into a more serious discussion of his new linemates.

“The speed that they bring is great,” he continued. “They're strong on pucks. They work hard to get those tough areas, even though they're not the biggest guys. To be honest, some of the guys I've played with in the past, it doesn't always have to be the biggest guys. It's the way you play. Everyone's working to get loose pucks and create turnovers and that kind of thing. I don't think size is an issue.”

Height shouldn't be valued over performance, of course, but that's a relatively new concept for NHL coaches and general managers.

Even just a few years ago, coach Mike Sullivan might have been scoffed at for putting together a trio as diminutive as his current top line. They won't get anywhere near the net, critics might say. They'll get steamrolled in the defensive zone.

With the game trending more toward speed and skill than size and strength with each passing season, Sullivan doesn't have to justify his decision to anyone.

“We thought about it,” Sullivan said. “We obviously discussed the pros and the cons. We thought the pros certainly outweighed the cons.

“I think what allows them to be successful is that all three of them are brave, and they don't get pushed around. I think they're hard to play against because they're elusive in tight space and they play with courage, and those two things can be dangerous. Even though they might be a little bit undersized, I think their hearts are bigger than their physical stature.”

The numbers back up Sullivan's praise.

The trio was first put together on a consistent basis while the Penguins were turning a 3-0 deficit into a 4-3 victory over Buffalo during a March 5 game. Guentzel and Sheary scored in the final five minutes of the comeback.

There are plenty of metrics that can measure how effective the line has been since. They've been one of the NHL's best lines at generating shot attempts this season. They've had some of the most impressive possession numbers of any trio Sullivan has tried all year long.

But keeping it as simple as possible, they've combined for seven goals, 19 points and 77 shots on goal in the past six games.

“I think we had 25 shots as a line,” Sheary said, recalling the genesis of the trio's success during the Buffalo game. “It was almost like we were creating chances every shift we were on the ice. I think that was maybe the turning point. We realized if we kept our chemistry and kept talking to each other, I think it was going to work out.”

Because all three members of the line have speed that's well above average, they obviously have created some scoring chances off the rush while playing together. They've had more success, however, on crafty give-and-go plays deep in the offensive zone.

If they stick together as a unit, that chemistry, more than their lack of size or excess of speed, just might end up being their calling card.

“I think we use our speed and try to get pucks behind their defensemen, get below the goal line and try to make some plays,” Guentzel said. “It's obviously gone well so far.”

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at or via Twitter at @BombulieTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.