ShareThis Page

Maatta, Penguins defense breathes life into team's offense

| Saturday, May 20, 2017, 12:36 a.m.
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
The Penguins' Olli Maatta celebrates his first period goal with Sidney Crosby during Game 4 of the Eastern Conference Final against the Senators Friday, May 19, 2017, at Canadian Tire Centre in Ottawa.
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
The Penguins' Brian Dumoulin celebrates his second period goal with Phil Kessel during Game 4 of the Eastern Conference Final against the Senators Friday, May 19, 2017, at Canadian Tire Centre in Ottawa.

Of the Penguins who lingered in the dressing room after their 3-2 win in Game 4 of the Eastern Conference final, arguably none tended to use profanity less than Olli Maatta, the baby-faced 22-year-old defenseman with the well-earned reputation for maturity.

Through the good and the bad of his own career and the Penguins season, Maatta has maintained an even-keel, family friendly vocabulary.

But the defenseman chose to use a term synonymous with peeved to describe his likely mentality if he had missed a prime scoring chance with less than a minute left in the opening period against Ottawa on Friday at Canadian Tire Centre.

"I saw a lot of netting there, so I would've been pretty (irritated) if I missed it," he said.

For the first time in the series, if not the playoffs, the Penguins' defensemen headed to the team bus certain they made a marked difference on the scoresheet. So often in the postseason, they concentrated their efforts on duties in their own zone. But the Penguins, in need of scoring from stars and secondary contributors alike, found saving graces in the form of Maatta, who scored his first career playoff goal, and Brian Dumoulin, who needed the game-winner and his second tally of the season when he banked a point shot off of Ottawa defenseman Dion Phaneuf's skate midway through the second period.

That productivity largely came from just five defensemen, as Chad Ruhwedel suffered a concussion late in the opening period after absorbing a hit to the head from Bobby Ryan.

"I thought our defensemen did as good a job as we've seen in this playoffs (Friday) along that offensive blue line, just becoming an option, making good decisions with the puck, helping us to sustain the offensive attack," coach Mike Sullivan said. "That's going to be an important component of our game moving forward."

Maatta recognized his chance to strike when he watched Sidney Crosby start a counterattack near Ottawa's defensive zone. He collected a pass and fired while racing down the left wing.

"I saw the opportunity to get up the ice," Maatta said. "When the puck goes to Sid, you obviously always want to be skating because he can make those plays. So it was a great play by Sid. I saw something there and put it on the net."

Dumoulin sought little to no credit for the good luck on his goal but viewed it as a satisfying plot twist.

"It felt good to be on the other end of those," Dumoulin said. "It's a fortunate bounce. I forgot who came out in the lane, but he did a good job. I was just trying to put a puck back door and hope for some luck."

Tasked with splitting minutes five ways for a second time in four games — Justin Schultz missed most of Game 2 with an upper-body injury — the Penguins defensemen refused to pity themselves. If anything, they wanted to get even more involved with the goal-scoring party. But those around the defensemen barely detected a difference in the mood of the corps after the bad news of Ruhwedel's injury and the better news of Maatta and Dumoulin's goals.

"Our defense corps is a quiet group," Sullivan said. "They just go about their business. We have plenty of vocal guys at the forward position, so there's only so much air time to go around, whether it be on the bench or in the locker room. But these guys just quietly go about their business."

Bill West is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at or via Twitter @BWest_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.