Three periods: Odd hops common at Canadian Tire Centre
Follow the bouncing puck
With Joe Louis Arena in Detroit set for the wrecking ball, the competition for NHL building most prone to strange bounces of the puck is wide open. In Game 3 of the Eastern Conference finals Wednesday night, the Canadian Tire Centre in Kanata, Ontario, threw its hat into the ring.
Two of Ottawa's four first-round goals came on odd hops off the end boards and back glass.
“It's definitely a funky building,” defenseman Brian Dumoulin said. “You see some of the pucks wrapped around the glass and how springy it is off the boards. Sometimes they take advantage of that. We can do a little bit more of that also. It's going to take some different bounces, some wacky bounces. We have to be ready for that.”
Still starting slowly
The avalanche of goals they were buried under at the beginning of Game 3 against Ottawa was a different look for the Penguins, but the general tenor of how the game started was disturbingly familiar.
If there's been a thread running through the entire postseason for the Penguins, it's been their inability to get off to strong starts. In the first period of 15 playoff games, they've been outscored 13-5 and outshot by an average of 12-7.
“We've got to have a good start every game,” defenseman Chad Ruhwedel said. “It's getting a little late in the season for starts like that.”
Same old Sens
Despite their four-goal first period in Game 3, the Senators are unlikely to change their approach entering Game 4 on Friday night. Their intention will be to clog up the neutral zone with their 1-3-1 forecheck and win by counter-attacking off mistakes.
Winger Bobby Ryan said he didn't think one offensive outburst would change the perception of his team.
“No, I think people will still continue to think we're the boring, old team,” he said. “We do. We clog the neutral zone. We make it hard for you to come through. It works for us, so we're sticking with it.”
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.