ShareThis Page

Chipped Ice A.M.: Penguins players sidestep goalie issue

| Friday, May 19, 2017, 8:03 a.m.

Editor's note: Visit for the Chipped Ice A.M. report every morning the Penguins play or practice throughout their series with the Capitals.

OTTAWA — In the cramped corners of a small locker room inside the University of Ottawa's rec center Thursday afternoon, a handful of Penguins players had a handful of awkward conversations.

When Marc-Andre Fleury gave up four goals in the first period of a 5-1 loss in Game 3 of the Eastern Conference finals and coach Mike Sullivan didn't immediately name his starter for Game 4 afterwards, it opened the door for a goaltender controversy.

Reporters, of course, happily waltzed through that door, liking nothing better than an old fashioned goalie debate. Naturally, then, they asked players for their opinions on the situation.

Any player with half a clue about what it means to be a part of a team would never stand up in front of a microphone and announce which of his teammates he thought could handle a high-pressure situation Friday night and which one he wasn't so sure about.

If any players actually had a strong preference, they were going to keep it to themselves, which, after all, is the hockey way.

So players were left to dance around the fringes of the issue, and most of the dances had the same basic steps.

— Players accepted their share of the blame for the first-period debacle in Game 3, noting that they didn't perform well enough in front of Fleury.

“You don't like putting your goalie in that situation like we did (Wednesday) night where we didn't give him a lot of help,” captain Sidney Crosby said. “So for many reasons, but I think especially that one, you just want to make sure that you're better as a group in front of him.”

— Players noted that they still have confidence in Fleury, despite his most recent showing. This is where they acknowledge his role in the team's postseason success thus far.

“He's been dynamite,” defenseman Brian Dumoulin said. “We've got two solid goalies. Flower has definitely played unbelievable and has kept us in a lot of games. Obviously we wouldn't be here without him. I've got full confidence in Flower.”

— Players vowed that they'll be on board with whatever the coaches decide.

“Whoever they put in the net is going to be great for us,” defenseman Chad Ruhwedel said. “They're both elite goaltenders. That's a decision that's going to be made by the coaches. Both goalies and all the players will absolutely support whatever decision they make.”

— Players promised to move past the poor showing and shift their focus to an all-important Game 4. A loss would put the Penguins in a deep 3-1 hole.

“I think that all the guys are supportive of each other, especially when it's your goaltender,” Crosby said. “I'm sure there's more than one guy saying, ‘Hey, you know what? It's on us, and we've got to be better in front of you.' Just like everyone else, he'll turn the page, and we will as a group and make sure we're better.”

When the dust settled and all cameras and microphones had been turned off, it was clear there was one player in the Penguins locker room who outdid the rest.

Even though English isn't his first language, Evgeni Malkin hit all the key talking points in a one-paragraph answer.

Perhaps he's the most skillful dancer of them all.

“Yeah, I think it's coach's decision. It's not players',” Malkin said. “We have both goalies, they're both good. I think Flower had bad game, not great game (Wednesday), but I think he's ready to play (Friday). He has great confidence. We believe in him. But it doesn't matter who stays in net, he needs help, you know? Players need help, like blocking shots … like do our job. I know goalies did a great job this year, and they're ready to focus and ready to play (Friday). But I don't pick goalie.”

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at or via Twitter at @BombulieTrib.

THE SERIES: Senators lead, 2-1.

LAST GAME: Craig Anderson turned in a relatively quiet 25-save performance in a 5-1 win over the Penguins in Game 3 Wednesday night.

NEXT GAME: The Penguins will look to improve to 12-2 in the game immediately following a playoff loss under Sullivan when they meet the Senators at 8 p.m. Friday at the Canadian Tire Centre.

A NOTE: The Penguins called off their morning skate Friday, instead opting to meet with reporters at the team hotel for an early afternoon press briefing. If Sullivan declines to name his starting goalie at that time, his decision won't be revealed until Fleury or Matt Murray leads the team onto the ice for warm-ups.

A QUOTE: “When you're challenged, you want to respond. I think, as a group, we've done that for a long time now. So I think this group has a lot of pride, a lot of character, and it's up to us to go and show that.” – Crosby

A NUMBER: 26 — shifts for rookie Carter Rowney in Game 3, most among Penguins forwards

Editor's note: Visit for the Chipped Ice A.M. report every morning the Penguins play or practice throughout their series with the Capitals.

Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Penguins goaltender Matt Murray a full participant during the morning skate and will back up Marc-Andre Fleury in game 7 against the Capitals Wednesday, May 10, 2017 at the Verizon Center.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Penguins goaltender Matt Murray a full participant during the morning skate and will back up Marc-Andre Fleury in game 7 against the Capitals Wednesday, May 10, 2017 at the Verizon Center.
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.