ShareThis Page

It's the season of dealing for Penguins GM Jim Rutherford

Jonathan Bombulie
| Monday, Jan. 1, 2018, 6:51 p.m.
Penguins general manager Jim Rutherford speaks during media day for the 2017 Stanley Cup Final Sunday, May 28, 2017, at PPG Paints Arena.
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Penguins general manager Jim Rutherford speaks during media day for the 2017 Stanley Cup Final Sunday, May 28, 2017, at PPG Paints Arena.
The Penguins' Carl Hagelin fights for the puck with the Avalanche Gabriel Landeskog in the third period Monday, Dec. 11, 2017 at PPG Paints Arena.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
The Penguins' Carl Hagelin fights for the puck with the Avalanche Gabriel Landeskog in the third period Monday, Dec. 11, 2017 at PPG Paints Arena.

It's hard to say whether a trade or two could shake the Penguins out of the funk that has enveloped them most of this season.

They're trapped in a vicious cycle of failing to finish scoring chances, forcing plays to try to create the next scoring opportunity, and when that doesn't work, giving up high-quality chances coming back the other way.

As 2018 dawns, they've lost seven of their last 10 games, falling to 10th place in the Eastern Conference, three points out of a playoff spot, and they've come by that position honestly.

It's also hard to say whether general manager Jim Rutherford could make a significant move at this point if he wanted to.

Opposing GMs aren't going to help the two-time defending Stanley Cup champions out of the goodness of their hearts, so he would have to find a trading partner feeling an equal degree of desperation.

One thing is for sure, though.

If Rutherford finds a deal he likes, he won't be shy about pulling the trigger. He has made 160 deals in more than two decades as a general manager, and he shows no signs of slowing down.

“Jim works extremely hard every day to try to improve our team and does everything within his power to help us get better,” coach Mike Sullivan said. “He's diligent in that regard. He has so much experience in his position that he has a real good feel for where our team is at and what our needs may be. If an opportunity presents itself for him to try to improve our team, he's going to do it.”

During his long managing career, Rutherford has earned a reputation as a dealer who is not constrained by the calendar. He won't wait for the trade deadline to make his big move.

A look at his trade history bears out that reputation. Like all GMs, Rutherford has made most of his deals around the draft and start of free agency (36.9 percent) and in the lead-up to the NHL trade deadline (31.9 percent).

His most transformative deals with the Penguins probably have come in the summer, such as when he picked up Phil Kessel from Toronto and Nick Bonino from Vancouver in July 2015.

What separates Rutherford from his GM brethren on the trade calendar, though, is probably his activity in the middle of the season. He has made 21.3 percent of his deals in December and January.

During his time in Carolina, he made two massive moves in the middle of the season.

In January 2000, he acquired Rod Brind'Amour from Philadelphia in a deal for Keith Primeau. In January 2006, he got Doug Weight from St. Louis for Mike Zigomanis, Jesse Boulerice and three draft picks.

With the Penguins, the acquisitions of David Perron, Trevor Daley and Carl Hagelin occurred in December and January.

If Rutherford is about to make a similar move this year, there's little doubt he's in intense information-gathering mode right now.

“One of the things I've really grown to admire about Jim as a manger is he might be the best listener I've ever been around,” Sullivan said. “He listens to the coaching staff, the hockey ops. He takes as much information as he can in order for him to make the most informed decisions. I think that's what makes him, in my mind, one of the better general managers in the league.

“If there's a deal on the table to be made, and he thinks it's going to help our team win games, then he has the gumption to make those trades. He's also creative. I don't think you can ever tell him a deal can't be made. He's always thinking outside the box and how to make certain transactions occur so that we can try to improve our club.”

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at jbombulie@tribweb.com or via Twitter @BombulieTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.