ShareThis Page
Penguins

Penguins position breakdown: Right wing should provide most offseason suspense

Jonathan Bombulie
| Wednesday, June 13, 2018, 7:09 p.m.
The Penguins' Phil Kessel skates past the Capitals' Tom Wilson during the first period in Game 2 of the Eastern Conference second round on April 29, 2018 in Washington.
Getty Images
The Penguins' Phil Kessel skates past the Capitals' Tom Wilson during the first period in Game 2 of the Eastern Conference second round on April 29, 2018 in Washington.
The Penguins' Patric Hornqvist goes at it with the Flyers' Nolan Patrick in the second period Friday during round one game two of the Stanley Cup Playoffs April 13, 2018 at PPG Paints Arena.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
The Penguins' Patric Hornqvist goes at it with the Flyers' Nolan Patrick in the second period Friday during round one game two of the Stanley Cup Playoffs April 13, 2018 at PPG Paints Arena.

Editor's note: Heading into the NHL draft June 22-23 and the opening of the free agent signing period July 1, staff writer Jonathan Bombulie will conduct a six-part, position-by-position examination of the team's organizational depth chart.

On the Penguins' organizational depth chart, the right side is where the excitement is.

Some of the most intriguing personnel decisions the franchise has made in the past four months and will make in the next four months involve the team's top four right wings — Phil Kessel, Patric Hornqvist, Bryan Rust and Daniel Sprong.

For Kessel, the question is whether he should be traded.

A portion of the team's fan base has revolted at the mere mention of moving Kessel, calling the idea a media-created mountain out of a molehill, but his value coming off a career-high 92-point season never will be higher, and he's not the most coach-friendly athlete around. A deal can't be ruled out.

For Hornqvist, the question was whether the Penguins could live without him.

General manager Jim Rutherford answered with an emphatic no in late February, signing the fiery Swede to a five-year contract extension.

For Sprong, the question is whether his time is now.

The Penguins have been extraordinarily patient with the 21-year-old top prospect, who was a point-per-game performer in the AHL last season and scored a couple of goals in an eight-game NHL tryout. They have wanted his play without the puck to match his high-end offensive skill.

He would need to clear waivers to be sent to Wilkes-Barre again, so at the least, his roster spot in October seems secure.

Finally, for Rust, the question is what his next contract will look like.

Rust is one of six key restricted free agents Rutherford will have to get under contract in the next month or so. A two-year, $5 million contract is probably a reasonable guess at what Rust will receive, unless the GM has his sights set on a longer-term solution.

In the NHL

Phil Kessel

Last year: 34-58—92. Age: 30. Years left on contract: 4

Patric Hornqvist

Last year: 29-20—49. Age: 31. Years left on contract: 5

Bryan Rust

Last year: 13-25—38. Age: 26. Years left on contract: RFA

Daniel Sprong

Last year: 2-1—3. Age: 21.Years left on contract: RFA

Mike Sullivan and his staff have debated for a couple years whether to play Kessel with Evgeni Malkin or split them up for more balance. Here's why it's such a difficult call. Two years ago, when Kessel and Malkin were on the ice together at five-on-five, the Penguins outscored their opponents 44-17. Last year, though, when the duo played together, the Penguins were outscored 31-28. So are they better together or not? … Hornqvist might be the most reliable player on the roster. He has scored between 21 and 30 goals all eight full seasons he has played in the NHL. … Rust is most valuable because of his versatility. He can play left or right wing on any of the team's four lines. … If Sprong can meet a baseline standard of play without the puck, he will be a contributor next season. If not, rocky times could lie ahead.

DOWN THE ROAD

Sam Lafferty

Height, weight: 6-1, 195. Age: 23

Jan Drozg

Height, weight: 6-0, 174. Age: 19

Lafferty, a Hollidaysburg native, is a two-way prospect who had a productive cup of coffee in Wilkes-Barre at the end of his college season last year. … Drozg, a native of Slovenia, is coming off a 50-point season in juniors in his first year in North America.

SWITCHING SIDES

It looks like the organizational depth chart is light on the right side, but that's only because this list includes exclusively wingers who are right-handed shooters. Left-handed shots like NHL regulars Conor Sheary and Tom Kuhnhackl and prospects Sam Miletic and Kasper Bjorkqvist, just to name a few, have experience playing on the right side.

THE BIG MOVE

A Kessel trade probably would be the biggest move the Penguins could make this offseason. For such a deal to make sense, Rutherford would need to receive a great offer — one that makes the Penguins' roster immediately better and/or clears salary cap space for a related high-impact move — from one of the eight teams not on Kessel's no-trade list.

THE SMALL MOVE

If the Penguins are planning to make use of Rust's versatility and move him around the lineup, it might be wise to target a low-cost free agent who can play right wing on the fourth line.

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at jbombulie@tribweb.com or via Twitter @BombulieTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me