Share This Page

Penguins' Michalek has hip surgery

| Wednesday, May 9, 2012, 8:26 p.m.
The Flyers' Eric Wellwood checks the Penguins' Zbynek Michalek during Game 6 at the Wells Fargo Center on April 22, 2012. Chaz Palla | Tribune Review
Philadelphia Flyers' Brayden Schenn, right, is knocked off the puck by Pittsburgh Penguins' Zbynek Michalek, of the Czech Republic, in the first period of Game 4 in a first-round NHL Stanley Cup playoffs hockey series on Wednesday, April 18, 2012, in Philadelphia. (AP Photo/Matt Slocum)

Penguins defenseman Zbynek Michalek had successful hip surgery, and the team believes he will be ready for the start of the 2012-13 season.

There was no indication from the Penguins that Michalek was playing with an injury during the season. The defenseman — who signed a five-year, $20 million contract in 2010 — did not speak with reporters following the team's final gathering April 24 at Consol Energy Center, when players often reveal injury news. He had two goals and 11 assists in 62 regular-season games.

The surgery was performed Wednesday by Dr. Thomas Byrd of the Nashville Sports Medicine and Orthopaedic Center. Michalek missed parts of the 2011-12 season with a concussion and a broken finger.

Michalek, a penalty killing specialist who turns 30 in December, had an even plus-minus rating in each of his first two seasons with the Penguins. Fellow Penguins defenseman Kris Letang acknowledged in April that he had been playing with a hip injury during the season.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.