Staal rejects Penguins' 10-year offer
Penguins center Jordan Staal has rejected a long-term offer to remain with the team and is leaning toward becoming an unrestricted free agent next summer, sources close to the negotiations told the Tribune-Review.
The Penguins' offer was for 10 years. Financial terms were not disclosed.
Staal, who is entering the final year a four-year contract worth $16 million, has not ruled out remaining with the Penguins but has told team officials he is open to signing with Carolina if a trade can be made.
“My only comments will be that Jordan is not prepared to enter into a contract extension at this time,” said his agent, Paul Krepelka.
Penguins general manager Ray Shero did not return messages seeking comment.
Staal, 23, is set to be married this weekend.
Many of his Penguins teammates are attending the wedding, and Staal is keeping them up to date regarding his situation with the team.
Staal's older brother, Eric, is the Hurricanes' top center and captain, and Jordan Staal is intrigued by the idea of playing with his brother in Carolina, where their parents now spend the majority of their time.
Younger brother Jared Staal is a prospect in the Hurricanes' system.
Staal was the first draft pick by Shero, who selected him second overall in 2006. Shero said earlier this week that he was not fielding offers for Staal and that re-signing him was a priority along with working out a long-term contract with center Sidney Crosby, whose deal is also set to expire after this season.
Staal scored 25 goals and tallied 25 assists in 62 games last season and finished with a plus-11 rating. He has 120 goals and 128 assists in 431 career games over six seasons.
Rob Rossi and Josh Yohe are staff writers for Trib Total Media. Rossi can be reached at email@example.com or 412-380-5635. Yohe can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org or 412-664-9161 Ext. 1975.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.