Penguins' Letang fully recovered from hip injury
Kris Letang's hair is a little shorter, but otherwise, the star defenseman looked like himself Monday at Southpointe.
This serves as a welcome relief to the Penguins despite the 2012-13 season being in jeopardy because of the NHL lockout.
Letang injured his hip late last season and acknowledged that it had become a problem during the Stanley Cup playoffs. But Letang never thought surgery was necessary.
“It's good now,” Letang said. “I talked with doctors after the season. They told me to let me know how it felt during (summer) training. It feels good.”
Following the Penguins' six-game series loss to Philadelphia in April, Letang admitted he had been playing with a sore hip. At the time, he didn't feel surgery was necessary but also acknowledged being uncertain heading into the summer.
In what had the look of a Norris Trophy campaign early on, Letang was plagued by injuries last season. He suffered two concussions — the first Nov. 26 in Montreal and another March 1 in Dallas — forcing him to miss 31 games.
He finished the regular season with 10 goals and 42 points in 51 games. Despite playing in pain, Letang recorded five points in six games against the Flyers in the first round of the playoffs.
Letang, who's known for working out extensively during the off-season, had to alter his approach.
The rest was all Letang required for his hip ailment to improve. He skated fluidly around a dozen of his teammates during Monday's informal workout.
Like center Sidney Crosby, Letang is open to playing in Europe if the lockout persists. He'll be healthy enough to do so.
“Just skated a little bit later than usual this summer,” he said. “But it does feel really good now.”
Josh Yohe is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.