NHL, locked-out players resume bargaining
NEW YORK — The NHL and the players' association seemingly had a good day Friday as they returned to the negotiating table.
It just wasn't good enough to bring the sides all that much closer to the end of the lockout that threatens the start of the hockey regular season.
The league and the union got back to bargaining for the first time since players were locked out Sept. 16, and the sides discussed secondary issues without broaching the big economic divide that is the essence of the dispute.
“It was a good day,” deputy commissioner Bill Daly said Friday night after the second negotiating session of the day. “I wish we had spent today on what we consider to be the more meaningful issues, but it is what it is.”
The sides were together for a total of about five hours — including a private meeting between commissioner Gary Bettman and union head Donald Fehr.
A handful of players also took part in the talks.
The groups agreed on issues related to player safety and drug testing, areas that weren't expected to be contentious. They will get together again Saturday morning and plan to meet Sunday, too, but the topics of discussion still don't seem to include the big dollar issues.
“I don't know if I would say significant, but we did seem to make some progress on a number of things. Hopefully we will continue,” Players' Association special counsel Steve Fehr said. “There is no plan right now to discuss core economic issues.”
And that is where the frustration lies. The NHL is waiting for the union to make a counterproposal to one the league made in the previous bargaining session more than two weeks ago.
“We can't make them talk about what they don't want to talk about,” Daly said. “In fairness, we do have to cover these issues if we're going to reach an agreement.”
Former player Mathieu Schneider, now an NHLPA special assistant to the executive director, said Friday morning there were agreements on more rigorous drug testing, expanding it to parts of the year during which testing is not currently done.
Neither side sees the use of performance-enhancing drugs as a problem in the NHL.
“We're in agreement that it's not an issue in our sport,” Schneider said. “I think it's in the players' best interest as well as the sport to close off any possible time during the year where players could use.”
Other topics on tap for Friday and through the weekend are health and safety issues, time players spend at training facilities, and other non-economic topics.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.