No talks scheduled in NHL lockout
The NHL and its Players' Association are in a deep freeze.
The sides are not scheduled to negotiate through the weekend, league and union officials said. Bargaining broke off Sunday after a meeting in New York that capped a run of negotiations in five of six days.
The NHL does not anticipate resuming negotiations, especially in a group setting that would include owners and players, until the Players' Association presents a new proposal for a labor agreement.
Optimism from a week ago has disappeared, at least from the league's perspective.
“It's very discouraging,” deputy commissioner Bill Daly said.
Union officials, specifically special counsel Steve Fehr, have not spoken in nearly as pessimistic terms since negotiations broke.
Players missed their third paycheck on Thursday.
Penguins players at Southpointe on Thursday said they have not given up hope for an early-December start to the season but only because the NHL has not extended its slate of canceled games.
There are no set plans for more cancellations, Daly said.
However, if negotiations do not resume by Thanksgiving weekend, there is an increasing likelihood the NHL will cancel games through Dec. 15 — possibly as soon as Nov. 26.
The NHL already has canceled 26 percent of its regular-season schedule by bagging games through November. Also, the Winter Classic outdoor game and surrounding New Year's Eve/Day events are scrapped.
A lockout, enacted by owners when the last labor agreement expired Sept. 15, hit Day 61 on Thursday.
Owners and players are divided on revenue split, owners' revenue sharing, method for guaranteeing players' current contracts and contractual issues such as maximum length for veterans and free agency.
Rob Rossi is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org or 412-380-5635.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.