Mediators — not Crosby — to attend NHL labor meeting
Federal mediators will be present when NHL labor negotiations resume Wednesday.
Penguins captain Sidney Crosby won't be.
Crosby confirmed he won't attend the talks one week after playing a key role in days of negotiations in New York.
“I don't plan on being there,” he said. “It's good that they're talking. Hopefully, something good happens.”
Federal mediators will preside over these talks for the first time since Nov. 29, when two days of sessions with mediators broke down. Those bargaining sessions were in Woodbridge, though neither the NHL nor NHLPA would disclose the site for Wednesday's sessions.
The NHL and NHLPA last negotiated Dec. 5 in New York. A day later, talks broke down after a group of owners new to the discussions, including the Penguins' Ron Burkle, became frustrated by a slow union response. Spirited news conferences by NHLPA executive director Don Fehr and NHL commissioner Gary Bettman followed.
Neither Fehr nor Bettman were involved in owners/players meetings last week that Crosby said were “very productive” before the Thursday breakdown. Owners won't attend the mediated session Wednesday.
An unusually large number of Penguins took part in a workout Tuesday at Southpointe. Players such as James Neal, Brooks Orpik and Deryk Engelland arrived last week in Pittsburgh, perhaps a sign that players believe a deal is imminent.
“That would be nice,” Engelland said. “I think we are to the point where, if this thing is going to get settled, it's probably going to be in the next week or two. We know that, and we want to be ready.”
Crosby reiterated he will consider playing in Europe if there is no agreement this season. He will, however, be patient in the next round of negotiations, hoping it will be the last one.
“No one's mindset is any different,” Crosby said. “Hopefully, this is a good thing. Hopefully, we figure something out.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.