Leafs stun Penguins in home opener at Consol
Dan Bylsma kind of called it.
Hours before his Penguins dropped their home opener, 5-2, to the Toronto Maple Leafs, Bylsma suggested that Wednesday night might prove problematic for his previously high-flying flightless fowl.
It was not a gut feeling for Bylsma, though this loss left everybody in the Penguins' dressing room feeling foul, especially after rousing weekend wins at Philadelphia and New York.
“Maybe our focus coming into the game, we think the Flyers will be a tough game and Toronto won't be,” defenseman Kris Letang said. “We need to treat everyone the same. We can't go off our game plan against anyone.”
That is especially true, Bylsma said, against an opponent that blends speed and skill the way these Maple Leafs can.
These Maple Leafs looked a lot like the Flyers last spring, when the Penguins were enticed into a game of trading chances and for it were bounced from Round 1 of the Stanley Cup playoffs in six games.
Given that their two best players are past MVPs and scoring champions, the Penguins should be equipped to trade chances with any opponent, let alone a Toronto franchise that has not played a postseason game since before the 2004-05 lockout.
However, as Bylsma and coaches have stressed to their players since the most recent lockout ended, this 48-game season is all about the Penguins re-establishing a defensive identity that is built on puck possession, quick movement and smart decision-making.
The largest crowd to watch hockey at Consol Energy Center (18,641) witnessed the Penguins — at best Bylsma said — play the Maple Leafs only “50-50” for possession in addition to providing Toronto “too much room and space.”
“And we didn't have the same attention to detail,” he said, referring to hallmarks of the Penguins' weekend wins against the Flyers and Rangers.
Superstar centers Sidney Crosby and Evgeni Malkin scored goals for the first time on the season, but in the final minutes Crosby was penalized for unsportsmanlike conduct and Malkin received an end-of-match game misconduct.
Bylsma did not have an explanation for Malkin's penalty, and Malkin was not available for comment.
Crosby, who assisted on Malkin's first-period power-play goal that staked the Penguins a lead, lamented the Penguins' making “a few mistakes — the big ones (the Maple Leafs) capitalized on.”
The Penguins are 35-4-1 — 22-2-1 at home — when Crosby and Malkin score a goal in the same game.
The Maple Leafs went 2-1-1 against the Penguins last season, even though nearly 30 points separated the clubs.
Toronto's speed was a problem then, as it was Wednesday.
Several Maple Leafs players said they believed they caught the Penguins off guard, and that was evident in a second period during which Toronto turned a 1-0 deficit into a 3-2 lead.
“I watched these guys on TV the other night, and they were dominant,” Maple Leafs left winger Clarke MacArthur said. “Maybe got in a little quicker on the forecheck. We disrupted a few things.”
That happened despite the Maple Leafs going 0 for 5 on the power play in the second period and just 1 for 8 with the advantage, its only goal coming on a third-period 5-on-3.
The Penguins (2-1-0, 4 points) go on the road Friday at Winnipeg, where the Jets play in front of one of hockey's most frenzied home crowds.
Six of the Penguins' next nine games are on the road.
“We need to find the emotional level that we had against the Flyers and the Rangers,” left winger Matt Cooke said. “We don't have time to have games like this.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- LaBar: Sting making history fighting for WWE title
- Travel-company founder offers ‘Safari’ memoir
- RB Williams believes he’s making seamless transition to Steelers
- Old N. Huntingdon map on display in township building
- Big plays cost Steelers defense in preseason loss at Bills
- Steelers notebook: Tomlin mum on Bryant suspension
- Steelworkers scoff at ATI earnings claim
- Philly-area school district says it can’t make payroll amid budget stalemate
- Solarize Allegheny powers up with more communities
- Record-holding female motorcyclist to speak at Lincoln Highway event
- Historic WWII-era landing ship tank docking at Heinz Field