Penguins notebook: Letang: Simple is better on power play
The Penguins' top power play practiced for about 20 minutes at Consol Energy Center on Wednesday.
Much like the previous evening, it failed to produce a goal.
The player coach Dan Bylsma referred to as the unit's “quarterback” wants to see progress.
“The results obviously aren't there right now,” defenseman Kris Letang said.
“To me, it's a question of shooting the puck,” Letang said. “We have to simplify things. We're trying to make the perfect plays, trying to set up all these plays and making these saucer passes. We need to simplify right now. Shoot the puck and crash the net.”
Bylsma tinkered with the power play during practice.
Letang played almost exclusively at the left point, and center Evgeni Malkin was at the right point. Right wing James Neal, left wing Chris Kunitz and center Sidney Crosby played down low, with Crosby rotating between the right and left circle. Neal had been working at the point through the season's first six games.
Jeffrey sticking with Malkin line
Bylsma seems to be intent on giving left wing Dustin Jeffrey an opportunity on Malkin's line. Jeffrey again skated with Malkin and Neal during practice.
The previous two wingers on that line apparently have been demoted.
Right wing Tyler Kennedy was on the fourth line with center Joe Vitale and winger Craig Adams.
Islanders right wing Colin McDonald, who played five games with the Penguins last season, was suspended two games for Tuesday's hit from behind on defenseman Ben Lovejoy, who left the game in the second period but returned for the third.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.