Share This Page

Q&A with Islanders forward Matt Martin

| Sunday, Feb. 3, 2013, 12:01 a.m.

Q: You became something of a villain in Pittsburgh after the infamous brawl on Long Island two years ago. Does some hostility between these teams still remain?

A: Well, I'm sure some does. I like to think most of it is water under the bridge at this point, and nothing terrible happened between these two teams last season. It's still a divisional game and still a rivalry. ... Things happen in hockey. It's not that big of a deal now.

Q: Do you still find yourself thinking about the brawl even though it's been two years?

A: Yeah, I do. It was a crazy game. It's an emotional game, and sometimes things get out of control. I've never been part of anything like that game. That was out of control. You always have to be prepared for stuff like that.

Q: With so many division games on this schedule, things figure to stay pretty intense?

A: Absolutely. And I really like the way the schedule is set up right now. I mean, these are the games that are easiest to get up for. When you see Pittsburgh, Philly, the Rangers and Devils on your schedule, you can't help but get up for those games. If you sleepwalk in these games, you're in all kinds of trouble. ... I think it's fun for the fans, and I know it's fun for us.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.