Penguins notebook: Kunitz's goal total receives a boost
Chris Kunitz scored a day off Monday.
He also scored another goal.
The NHL awarded him the Penguins' first goal from a victory at Washington on Sunday. Originally credited to defenseman Paul Martin, the goal was awarded to Kunitz, whose stick deflected Martin's point-shot past Capitals goalie Braden Holtby at 3:37 of the opening period.
Kunitz said Sunday he thought he had scored the goal.
With this decision, Kunitz became the Penguins' first player since Jaromir Jagr to score four goals in a game. Jagr netted four against the New York Rangers at Mellon Arena on Oct. 14, 2000.
Kunitz was named the NHL's No. 2 star for last week (five goals and eight points in four games).
Kunitz, who has been recovering from flu symptoms since Wednesday, did not practice Monday. He is expected to play Tuesday at the New York Islanders.
• Defenseman Kris Letang also didn't practice, but he is expected to play against the Islanders. He is second among Penguins players with an average ice time of 25 minutes, 5 seconds. Martin is first at 25:11.
• The Penguins did not travel to New York after Sunday's win at Washington. Instead, they spent Sunday night watching the Super Bowl and traveled to New York after practicing Monday afternoon at Kettler Iceplex in Arlington, Va.
• Former Penguins Radio Network broadcaster Steve Mears made his debut Monday as a full-time employee of NHL Network. Mears will handle several duties, including serving as a co-host of “NHL Live” from 5 to 7 p.m. weeknights.
— Rob Rossi
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.