Penguins notebook: Crosby earns league's No. 2 star for February
• Sidney Crosby had quite a February. Not quite good enough, though, to earn the NHL's No. 1 star. That honor went to Tampa Bay center Steven Stamkos, who tied for the NHL lead with 10 goals and recorded 20 points. He scored a goal in six straight games. Stamkos was top in goals (14) and points (31) before games Friday. The goal lead provided Stamkos a tiebreaking edge on Crosby in the scoring race. Over 14 games, Crosby registered 18 assists and totaled 24 points. He amassed three points on six occasions. Crosby was the No. 2 star for February. Chicago goalie Ray Emery (7-0-0, 1.66 goals-against average) was third.
• The team did not provide updates on injured defenseman Paul Martin (undisclosed lower-body injury) or center Evgeni Malkin (concussion). Martin did not finish a loss at Carolina on Thursday night. He also did not practice Wednesday, though coach Dan Bylsma said then Martin simply was given a day off. Malkin had skated without contact at the Penguins' practice facility at Southpointe on Wednesday and Thursday. His concussion symptoms had subsided, Bylsma said Thursday. Malkin will not play Saturday night.
• The Penguins failed to score a power-play goal Thursday, snapping a 12-game streak. They just missed tying the 2007-08 squad's achievement of 13 consecutive games with a power-play goal (Feb. 2-26, ‘08). Those Penguins went 8-2-3 over that stretch. The Penguins were 8-4-0 on their run.
• The Penguins and Maple Leafs were the only two clubs without an overtime or shootout loss in February.
— Rob Rossi
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.