Malkin, Crosby stand tall in Penguins' victory over Lightning
Evgeni Malkin returned Monday.
He returned to the Penguins after missing four consecutive games with a concussion, and he flashed the MVP form that carried his club last season during captain Sidney Crosby's absence.
Malkin's breathtaking goal and Crosby's inspired shift in the third period turned around a game against the Tampa Bay Lightning and sparked the Penguins' 4-3 victory at Consol Energy Center.
“We try to make sure we produce,” Crosby said. “At a big time like that, I think it was just more a product of the way we played.”
Crosby's 11th goal and assist on left winger Chris Kunitz's opening marker allowed him to keep a two-point lead in the NHL scoring race. Lightning center Steven Stamkos, who scored his 16th and 17th goals, is second with 34 points.
Malkin, one of two current NHL players with multiple scoring titles, is well behind Crosby and Stamkos. Malkin has 23 points (five goals, 18 assists).
Upon returning to Pittsburgh after the NHL lockout, which he spent playing for his hometown Metallurg Magnitogorsk of Russia's Kontinental Hockey League, Malkin said Crosby was probably the best bet to win the scoring title and MVP.
Malkin did not make himself available for comment after this victory over Tampa Bay, though his bullish play spoke volumes.
“He had the puck on his stick what seemed like the whole night,” said Matt Cooke, who resumed playing left wing on a line with Malkin and right winger James Neal.
Malkin finished with five shots and a plus-1 rating.
The Penguins were trailing, 2-1, when he scored in the fifth minute of the third period that center Brandon Sutter said made teammates on the bench “kind of laugh.”
With defenseman Brooks Orpik behind the net in the Penguins' zone following a big hit by Lightning captain Vincent Lecavalier, Malkin carried the puck into the other end and, in a sudden burst, split two Tampa Bay players while cutting to his left into the slot, falling then whipping a shot past goalie Anders Lindback.
“I mean, what else are you going to do when a guy scores a goal like that?” Sutter said of the laughing Malkin's tally inspired. “What a goal.”
What a sequence by Crosby about two minutes later.
He stole a puck from Stamkos in the defensive zone, and then finished a rush by hammering home a slick feed from defenseman Kris Letang, who passed across and into the slot while on both knees after circling from behind the net. By that point, Crosby already had produced at least a point in 27 of 37 regular-season games dating to his return from a concussion last season.
He has racked up 17 goals and 59 points over that span.
The Penguins (15-8-0, 30 points) won a second consecutive game and looked a lot better defensively than they did at any point during a three-game road trip during which they allowed 16 goals.
Goalie Marc-Andre Fleury again played better than his 25 saves suggested.
Neal's empty-netter kept him within striking distance of Stamkos. Neal has 14 goals.
However, the story of this win was the return of Malkin — both to his team and to the form the Penguins will need if they are to contend for the Stanley Cup.
“He looked really good,” Crosby said. “I don't know if he was doing any stick-handling while we were gone, but that looked pretty sharp. When he's going like that, it's pretty tough to stop him.”
So are the Penguins when Malkin and Crosby get going as they did against Tampa Bay.
“That's what we need,” Cooke said. “They're our two offensive powerhouses. They lead the way.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.