Share This Page

Penguins notebook: Blackhawks' streak impresses Penguins

| Friday, March 8, 2013, 7:51 p.m.

• The Penguins generally concern themselves with the Eastern Conference, this season, in particular, because their schedule does not include a Western Conference team. Still, like the rest of the hockey world, they've been quite aware of the Blackhawks. And quite impressed. Chicago entered play Friday in Colorado with a 21-0-3 record. “I watched the whole game (Wednesday) night,” Penguins defenseman Brooks Orpik said. “I'm so impressed by their balance. Obviously, you need a little bit of luck, but it's easy to point to luck. When it gets this long, it's not luck.” Some of the great regular season teams in NHL history — namely the 1993 Penguins and 1996 Red Wings — have failed in the postseason. The Penguins, though, sense that the Blackhawks aren't going to be emotionally fatigued by this streak, unlike other great regular season teams that perhaps became consumed by their pre-playoff success. “That's a great team,” left wing Tanner Glass said. “I played against them a lot in Vancouver. I was part of a great rivalry. It's obvious what a confident bunch they are right now. They're playing like they aren't feeling any pressure at all.”

• Penguins coach Dan Bylsma confirmed that he has not been displeased with the recent work of defenseman Simon Despres, who did not play against the Flyers on Thursday. “The consistency in his game is really where he needs to improve,” Bylsma said. “But he didn't come out of the lineup because of inconsistent play. It was just a situation where we went with a more veteran lineup in Philadelphia. It's a tough building.”

• Defenseman Kris Letang did not practice Friday. Bylsma did not indicate that the Penguins are dealing with any injuries.

— Josh Yohe

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.