ShareThis Page

Rivalry between Penguins, Capitals waning

| Wednesday, March 20, 2013, 12:01 a.m.
Penguins defenseman Brook Orpik works without a stick against Washington's Alex Ovechkin during the second period Tuesday, March 19, 2013, at Consol Energy Center.
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Penguins defenseman Brook Orpik works without a stick against Washington's Alex Ovechkin during the second period Tuesday, March 19, 2013, at Consol Energy Center.

It has been four years since the Penguins and Washington Capitals met in their classic Stanley Cup second-round playoff series and two years since the Winter Classic was held at Heinz Field.

Time, it seems, has dulled the luster from what once was hockey's most publicized rivalry.

“The rivalry really has drifted,” said defenseman Matt Niskanen, who was traded to Pittsburgh six weeks following the 2011 Winter Classic. “It's funny. You always used to hear about that rivalry and would see it on TV all the time. I thought it would be a bigger deal when I got here.”

Lack of playoff success is likely the biggest reason the rivalry has faded.

The Penguins have dropped three consecutive playoff series. The Capitals haven't advanced past the second round in the Alex Ovechkin era.

In 2009, Ovechkin and Penguins captain Sidney Crosby combined for 27 points in a series that featured three overtime games.

“It's still a big deal when we play them,” Capitals center Nicklas Backstrom said. “But yeah, it probably isn't the same since that playoff series. Things are different now.”

No one is more different than Ovechkin.

The Capitals star is still productive but at 27 no longer ranks among the league's most dominant players. His numbers have steadily declined during the past three seasons.

No one can explain Ovechkin's decline, though Niskanen has a theory.

“Don't get me wrong. The guy is still a really good player,” Niskanen said. “But I think players have just adjusted to what he does well. If you know a player's tendencies, it obviously makes it easier to play against him. And I think the league knows what his tendencies are right now.”

The debate between Crosby and Ovechkin is long over. Through the first five seasons of their respective careers, the former No. 1 overall draft picks were comparable statistically and clearly possessed some respectful disdain for one another.

In the hours before the Penguins and Capitals battled, Ovechkin, who historically respected the Penguins' stars but never anointed them, meekly spoke of Crosby and Evgeni Malkin without being asked.

“Everybody knows Crosby and Malkin are the two best players in the league right now,” Ovechkin said.

The closest anyone came to producing fighting words on the morning of the game was Capitals coach Adam Oates, who said of the Penguins: “They're very good and very cocky.”

There was a time when such a comment from the Capitals would have aggravated the Penguins. However, with one team at the top of the Eastern Conference standings and the other near the bottom, even mildly hostile words don't seem to create a nasty element.

“It's still a big deal, and there are still lots of great players when these teams meet,” said defenseman Mark Eaton, a veteran of the classic 2009 series. “But yeah, it might not be quite the same.”

Josh Yohe is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @JoshYohe_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.