Penguins notebook: Tangradi happier in Winnipeg
•Former Penguins left wing Eric Tangradi made his return to Consol Energy Center on Thursday, and he did so in a happier frame of mind than during his time with the Penguins.
Tangradi rarely saw regular time in the lineup in Pittsburgh but has been a regular for the Jets. He admitted Thursday that he never felt comfortable in the Penguins' lineup, as one mistake might lead to a benching. “When I first got traded,” Tangradi said, “I probably said some things that weren't real accurate as far as being on a short leash.”
Tangradi has produced just one goal and one assist in 22 games with the Jets but has been more of a physical presence than during his time with the Penguins. He said the move to Winnipeg was a good one for his career.
“I just needed to play every day,” he said. “That's what I've got now.”
• Penguins goalie Marc-Andre Fleury did not dress against the Jets, though the Penguins believe he will be available for Saturday's game against the New York Islanders. Fleury is dealing with neck stiffness following a collision with teammateTyler Kennedy on Tuesday. Because Fleury did not dress, the Penguins recalled goaltender Jeff Zatkoff to play behindTomas Vokoun.
• Defenseman Deryk Engelland and center Dustin Jeffrey were healthy scratches against the Jets. Defenseman Robert Bortuzzo also was listed as a healthy scratch, though he is taking part in a conditioning assignment with Wilkes-Barre/Scranton.
• Former Penguins left wingKevin Stevens attended Thursday's game and received a warm ovation from the crowd when shown on the scoreboard.
— Josh Yohe
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.