Penguins notebook: Letang takes first step toward return
• It was only one practice, so Kris Letang doesn't think it's fair to say whether or not he's ready to return to play for the Penguins. But the defenseman's presence Monday at Southpointe was part of what he called getting “ready for the big picture. There's no rush to get back but, at the same time, it's a short season,” said Letang, who has missed five games with a groin injury. “I want to start playing, be healthy and make sure when we get into the playoffs I'm ready to go.” Penguins coach Dan Bylsma said Letang remains day to day but called it a “good step for him” and a “good sign.”
• Count defenseman Brooks Orpik among those eagerly awaiting Letang's return. Orpik said the Penguins miss Letang's puck-moving ability in transition and breakouts, as well as his ability to eat minutes and play on the power play, especially with Paul Martin out. But he's also in no hurry for Letang to come back too soon. “I think he rushed it back the last time and set himself back, so hopefully he's been a little more patient and learned from that,” Orpik said. “Getting him back would be huge.”
• Orpik was reluctant to weigh in on the NHL's decision not to discipline New York Rangers defenseman Michael Del Zotto for his reverse-forearm/elbow Friday that gave winger James Neal a concussion. “I was surprised there wasn't at least a hearing,” Orpik said. “It hasn't been a topic of conversation in our locker room, I know that.”
• Bylsma called it a “first step” that the Penguins clinched a playoff berth Sunday. “Just getting to the playoffs is not our goal, not where we want to finish,” Bylsma said. “We still have a significant amount of work to do, but when I see the ‘X' in the standings, it's always a good thing.”
— Kevin Gorman
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.