ShareThis Page

Penguins' Cooke leans on family, Pittsburgh in rough week

| Thursday, April 25, 2013, 11:28 p.m.
The Penguins' Matt Cooke checks the Senators' Cory Conacher during the third period Monday, April 22, 2013.
The Penguins' Matt Cooke checks the Senators' Cory Conacher during the third period Monday, April 22, 2013.

NEWARK, N.J. — Penguins left wing Matt Cooke sat by his locker Thursday afternoon, looked up and smiled. For the first time in a week, Cooke was all alone.

It must have been quite a relief.

Consider what Cooke has endured during the past week:

• After delivering a hip check to Boston defenseman Andy McQuaid, Cooke was bashed by broadcaster Jack Edwards, who compared him to Robert F. Kennedy assassin Sirhan Sirhan.

• Before Monday's game against Ottawa, NBC commentator Mike Milbury referred to Cooke as a “skunk.”

• Fans in Ottawa organized an anti-Matt Cooke rally before Monday's game because of their belief that he intentionally stomped on the back of Ottawa defenseman Erik Karlsson's Achilles tendon, causing a significant injury.

• The Ottawa Sun published consecutive opinion pieces that referred to Cooke as “dastardly,” among many other more negative, controversial descriptions.

These days, Cooke brushes it all off his back.

“You know,” Cooke said, “personal attacks from announcers … they're paid to give their opinion. It's the world we live in.”

It's also the world Cooke's family lives in.

Cooke, a husband and father, has discussed the criticism with his family.

“I've told my kids and my family that we've had to deal with stuff a lot worse than this,” Cooke said. “Just take it in stride.”

Cooke leans on his family during weeks like this and also feels a particular sense of gratitude toward everything about Western Pennsylvania. Having Pittsburgh as his home and the Penguins organization by his side, Cooke insists, has made the adversity of the past week far more tolerable.

“Thankfully we're in a great place like Pittsburgh,” he said. “The team, the fans in Pittsburgh and the organization has always been so supportive of me. It's made it so much easier on my family to have Pittsburgh.”

Cooke also takes comfort in his knowledge that he really has changed. He admits to having deserved a reputation for being a reckless player earlier in his career.

The summer of 2011, though, changed the man and the player. February's Karlsson incident is the closest Cooke has come to delivering a questionable hit. He was not penalized for the hit by on-ice officials nor by the league.

Few outside of Ottawa felt the hit was intentional.

“It's definitely easy to take and to handle when I know the way I approach the game is completely different than the way it was two years ago,” Cooke said. “There are a lot of people who have helped me through that process. I've put a lot of time and effort into it.”

Karlsson returned to action in Washington on Thursday, something that brought a smile to Cooke's face.

“Freak accidents happen,” Cooke said. “But it's a lot easier to get up and talk when you know your intentions were innocent. Obviously I want Erik to play. There was no intent. The sooner he comes back, the better it is for me.”

Josh Yohe is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @JoshYohe_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.