Pens salute heroes' 'great save'
David Allen finally made it to Consol Energy Center.
He attended the Penguins' regular-season home finale Saturday against Carolina, two months after he went into cardiac arrest outside Epiphany Catholic Church prior to a game Feb. 22.
“I made it to the curb last time,” said Allen, 66, of Beaver. “It was supposed to be my first game in this building.”
Allen and two men that UPMC doctors credited with saving his life — Forrest Hodges and Freddie Waine — were guests of the Penguins on Saturday.
The men and their families dined at the Lexus Club, sat in Section 108 and were presented with autographed jerseys by Penguins general manager Ray Shero.
Allen received a signed replica of Evgeni Malkin's No. 71. His Malkin jersey was ruined when Hodges and Waine, an ex-Army medic, rushed to his aide.
Allen collapsed late in the afternoon that day.
Hodges, 53 of the North Side, was off duty from his position with the Pittsburgh police, working traffic at Centre Avenue. Waine, 29 of Washington, was walking toward Consol Energy Center with his son.
Hodges and Waine rushed to assist Allen, both providing CPR until firefighters, Zone 2 police and city medics arrived, Hodges said.
Allen was taken to UPMC Mercy. He spoke with Hodges that night and with Waine a week later.
“There is no doubt he was in the right place at the right time and with the right people around him,” said Allen's girlfriend, Lynne Murray, 53. “The doctors said 7 percent of people that go into cardiac arrest outside of a medical facility survive. He was really lucky.”
Hodges and Waine also were presented with autographed jerseys.
Shero handed them signed replicas of goaltender Marc-Andre Fleury's jersey.
Fleury famously made a Stanley Cup-clinching save in Game 7 of the Final at Detroit four years ago.
“But you talk about great saves,” Shero said while presenting Hodges and Waine their jerseys. “What you guys made was a great save.”
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.