Kunitz overtime goal gives Penguins 2-1 series lead
UNIONDALE, N.Y. — Marc-Andre Fleury did not want to go there.
The Penguins had won Game 3 of a first-round Stanley Cup playoff series against the New York Islanders on left winger Chris Kunitz's overtime goal Sunday afternoon.
They had taken a 2-1 lead in the best-of-seven series.
They had avoided any reason to feel pressure heading into Game 4 on Tuesday at Nassau Coliseum.
“We didn't (lose), and they didn't (win),” Fleury said. “So let's not go there.”
There, of course, is recent history that hovers over the Penguins — specifically a nucleus that includes captain Sidney Crosby, his fellow former MVP/scoring champion center Evgeni Malkin, coach Dan Bylsma, general manager Ray Shero and Fleury, the franchise goalie.
Those men had the Penguins favored to reach the Stanley Cup final last year, too. Blown leads and poor play led to a 3-0 hole in a series that the Philadelphia Flyers ultimately won in six games.
Those men had the Penguins as the defending champions in 2010. Then uncharacteristic gaffes helped the eighth-seeded Montreal Canadiens turn a 3-2 series deficit into a seven-game dethroning.
Another seven-game loss, to Tampa Bay in a series that Crosby and Malkin missed, was wedged between the disappointing defeats to Montreal and Philadelphia.
“We can't expect certain things to go away,” defenseman Paul Martin said.
The Penguins, favored since the NHL lockout ended in January to reclaim the Cup they won in 2009, can expect extreme scrutiny of every win and loss this postseason.
“For sure, and partly that's from everyone else,” Martin added. “It's, ‘Look at who the Penguins picked up (before the NHL trade deadline), look at how good they are.' Obviously, we have a lot of good players, and we put up a lot of wins during the regular season, but that doesn't mean anything.”
Having Crosby and Malkin healthy — relatively, as Crosby is recovering from a broken jaw and Malkin is dealing with a sore left shoulder — doesn't mean anything.
Having dressed for Game 3 nine players who also were dressed for that victorious Game 7 of the Cup Final at Detroit four years ago doesn't mean anything.
Having wingers Jarome Iginla and Brenden Morrow, each a former team captain who waived a no-trade clause in his contract to join the Penguins, doesn't mean anything.
Also something that meant nothing Sunday: Protecting a lead.
The Islanders were ahead, 2-0, before Iginla (5 on 3) and Kunitz pulled the Penguins even with power-play goals, and right winger Pascal Dupuis' third of the playoffs staked his club a lead late in the first period.
Malkin then found defenseman Douglas Murray, whose first goal in 35 playoff games pushed the Penguins to a 4-2 lead that they carried into the final period.
Two of the Islanders' most skilled forwards, right winger Kyle Okposo and center John Tavares, erased that deficit in a span of about five minutes late in regulation.
Okposo's shorthanded goal stands as the only blemish of the series for a Penguins power play that has gone 6 for 13 (46.2 percent).
Actually, the Islanders probably can find comfort in knowing that they are outscoring the Penguins at 5-on-5 play over the past two games, 6-4.
“We're up (in the series), 2-1, yes, but at the same time, the power play has saved us,” Dupuis said.
So, too, has this history that hovers, Fleury said.
Champions are not preordained. Playoff wins — a game, let alone a series — are not easily obtained.
The Penguins are not perfect.
They are, however, two wins closer to their stated goal of four playoff victories.
“It's big,” Fleury said. “It's a win. That's what matters.
“We have guys who have experiences, a lot of guys who have been through a lot. That's what pays off for us in these playoffs.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.