Share This Page

Penguins notebook: Neal unlikely to play Game 2

| Thursday, May 2, 2013, 7:12 p.m.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
The Penguins' James Neal plays against the Islanders on Wednesday, May 1, 2013, at Consol Energy Center.

Neal limping, likely out

Right winger James Neal did not practice Thursday and is unlikely to play for the Penguins in Game 2 on Friday. Injured in the second period of Game 1 on a hit by defenseman Travis Hamonic of the Islanders, Neal still was limping — heavily favoring his right leg — Thursday.

Orpik coy

Coach Dan Bylsma has instructed players not to divulge details of injuries during the Stanley Cup playoffs, and defenseman Brooks Orpik stuck to that after practicing Thursday.

Orpik has not played since April 23 because of a lower-body injury. He was officially considered day to day before the Penguins stopped providing any injury-related information to the public.

Meaning of ‘4'

The Penguins' official team T-shirt is black with the numeral “4” on its back.

That number began taking on significance in January when, after the NHL lockout ended, general manager Ray Shero said he wanted the Penguins to stop talking about winning the Stanley Cup and instead focus on taking four games in a best-of-seven playoff series. Shero reiterated that thought after his March trades for veterans. On Monday, during his first playoff news conference, Bylsma said seven times that his players are focused on getting four wins. The Penguins have lost three straight playoff series to lower-seeded opponents.

—Rob Rossi

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.