ShareThis Page

Absence of veteran defenseman Orpik showing for Penguins

| Monday, May 6, 2013, 11:12 p.m.

UNIONDALE, N.Y. — The Penguins are playing without (their) conscience.

The New York Islanders have noticed.

“He's strong, he's physical, he's very good in his own end, and he's tough to take it to the net against,” Islanders right winger Brad Boyes said of Penguins defenseman Brooks Orpik. “With him out of the lineup, it does help us.”

Orpik could help the Penguins take a vice-like grip on their first-round Stanley Cup playoff series — they lead, 2-1 — if he plays in Game 4 on Tuesday night.

He was not available for comment Monday after joining teammates for an optional practice at Nassau Coliseum. He had not practiced since Thursday.

Orpik would not have said anything about his undisclosed lower-body injury anyway. Players have been instructed not to talk about injuries as part of the club's new playoff policy.

Orpik, the Penguins' longest-tenured player, has played under four coaches during his nine full seasons, and his preference for honesty has, at one point, irritated every one of those men.

He calls things like he sees them, especially when things are not going well. Hence the ‘Conscience' moniker bestowed upon him by members of the media.

So when Orpik, as he has this postseason, chooses to say nothing about an injury that has prevented him from playing in five consecutive games dating to the regular season ... well, that is perhaps the best example of a Penguins player going all-in for this Stanley Cup chase.

To win the chase for the Cup without Orpik for an extended stretch seems unrealistic, though.

He remains the Penguins' one irreplaceable defenseman.

Coach Dan Bylsma did not say that exactly on Monday, but his words about Orpik pointed out what the Penguins have missed in Games 1, 2 and 3.

“His ability to play against other teams' good players in a shutdown role,” Bylsma said, noting a majority of Orpik's 22 minutes per game were played against opponents' top forwards.

The sight of skilled Islanders forwards — most notably right winger Kyle Okposo — driving to the net with success over the past two games has left an impression on more than just Bylsma.

“It's definitely been to our advantage to try to do that,” Boyes said, noting that only defenseman Doug Murray has proven an imposing obstacle for the Penguins.

Orpik would change the dynamic, Boyes said.

“It's very hard to keep him off to the side with an arm or something,” Boyes said.

Already in this series, Bylsma has soured on Deryk Engelland and Simon Despres as replacements for Orpik. Engelland was yanked from the lineup after Game 2, and Despres played only about a minute in the third period and overtime in Game 3.

If Orpik is not ready for Game 4, Bylsma's choices would be between Engelland, Despres and Robert Bortuzzo, who has played in only four games dating to March 1.

The Penguins would prefer to check with their conscience, because Orpik would make everybody on the blueline look a lot better — especially around the blue paint of an increasingly crowded goal crease.

“He brings a little bit of a calming presence, but he brings that intensity, too,” defenseman Paul Martin said. “There just aren't a lot of guys like him anymore.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.