Penguins notebook: Orpik, Neal return
Orpik, Neal return
Veteran leader Brooks Orpik, a defenseman, and right winger James Neal, played for the Penguins in Game 4 of a first-round Stanley Cup playoff series against the Islanders at Nassau Coliseum on Tuesday.
Orpik (lower-body) had missed five straight games dating to the regular season, and he said before Game 4 that his attempt to practice last week was a mistake. Orpik was paired with regular defense partner Paul Martin in Game 4.
Neal (right ankle) was injured on a hit by Islanders defenseman Travis Hamonic in Game 1, and had not played since. Neal opened on a line with regular center Evgeni Malkin. Jarome Iginla played the left wing.
Rookie winger Beau Bennett was a healthy scratch for Game 4. He has played in Games 1-3, opening the series with a goal. Bennett had only that goal, but was a plus-2 and had averaged over 10 minutes in each game.
Right winger Tyler Kennedy, a regular on the 2008 and 2009 Cup Final Penguins, was a healthy scratch for a fourth straight playoff game.
Center Brandon Sutter began Game 4 working on the fourth line, where he spent the latter part of Game 3 on Sunday. Sutter, the key piece acquired in a trade of Jordan Staal last June, had anchored the third line during the regular season when Malkin and center Sidney Crosby were healthy.
Sutter had recorded only three shots while failing to score in Games 1-3.
Jussi Jokinen, acquired at the trade deadline, centered the third line with left winger Brenden Morrow and Matt Cooke on the right wing.
Crosby will appear on regional covers of Sports Illustrated this week. The headline on the cover reads Crosby is the NHL's “most amazing player.” He also appeared on the cover of the magazine after Canada's 2010 Olympics victory and following the Penguins' 2009 Cup win.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.