Share This Page

NHL Insider: Reunion with Kunitz leaves Malkin feeling fine

| Friday, May 10, 2013, 9:58 p.m.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
The Penguins’ (from left) Chris Kunitz, Sidney Crosby and Evgeni Malkin celebrate Malkin’s third-period goal against the Lightning on Monday, March 4, 2013, at Consol Energy Center.

UNIONDALE, N.Y.

Evgeni Malkin felt good going into Game 5.

“Really good,” he said.

There was a reason.

Malkin knew that at some point during the pivotal contest of a closely contested Eastern Conference quarterfinal series between the Penguins and New York Islanders that he and regular right winger James Neal would be reunited with their best buddy.

That would be Chris Kunitz, the left winger with whom every MVP center on the Penguins really wants to play.

Late in the first period Thursday night at Consol Energy Center, coach Dan Bylsma finally unleashed the lines that he had wanted to try out late in the regular season.

Kunitz went to work with Malkin and Neal, and Pascal Dupuis moved from right to left wing so center Sidney Crosby could play with Jarome Iginla.

This was Bylsma's plan all along for these men: three former scoring champions (Crosby, Malkin, Iginla), two (Kunitz, Neal) who have finished as top-10 scorers and the other guy (Dupuis) coming off consecutive 20-goal campaigns.

Crosby's broken jaw did not allow Bylsma to experiment with the groupings late in the regular season.

The playoffs are no time to experiment, especially with a best-of-seven series tied, 2-2. It helped ease any concerns Bylsma might have had that Kunitz, the NHL's No. 2 scorer at one point during the season, said he would play, well, anywhere for the Penguins.

“I don't think we've ever had a problem with guys jumping into any lineup,” Kunitz said.

“We know we have a lot of guys on this team that are used to being in maybe different situations, but we can put out different lineups with guys taking on different roles.

“It's about being unselfish, and it's great to be a part of that when it's going on out there.”

Selfishness is not often associated with Malkin or Crosby, but there is good reason both prefer playing with Kunitz to their left.

He was in that spot for Malkin last season when Malkin won a second scoring title and MVP, and Neal scored 40 goals for the first time.

Crosby would have won a second scoring title this season had he not missed the final 12 regular-season games, and he is an MVP finalist. Kunitz was a staple as his left winger.

Kunitz said he believes he meshes with either elite center because he does not alter his approach. He works the corners and front of the net, plays the body and shoots when open. He also knows that the puck is better suited on the stick blades of Crosby or Malkin, so in accordance Kunitz moves it quickly.

Malkin has said his ailing left shoulder has weakened his usually powerful shot, so the placement of Kunitz on his left wing is doubly beneficial for the Penguins.

It boosts Malkin's confidence, which despite his stature can occasionally wane. Also, Kunitz creates space, Malkin said.

That space provides Malkin an extra half-second, which is often all he needs to draw a goalie into overcommitting or a defenseman away from Neal, who has mastered the off-angle shot from the opposite wing.

Neal attempted eight shots in Game 5.

Malkin attempted seven, won six of 11 faceoffs and recorded an assist — all in about 15 minutes.

It was his most efficient performance of the playoffs, perhaps his most complete.

It was no coincidence that Kunitz was his left-hand man.

Rob Rossi is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at rrossi@tribweb.com or via Twitter @RobRossi_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.