Penguins notebook: Bylsma keeping Penguins rested
The influx of 30-somethings onto the Penguins roster during the past year — Jarome Iginla, Brenden Morrow, Douglas Murray, Jussi Jokinen and Tomas Vokoun are longtime players — has turned coach Dan Bylsma's team into the league's oldest with an average age of 29.5.
Bylsma insists the team's age isn't the reason for the unusual amount of days off during the Penguins' series against the Islanders, but there is no question Bylsma wants his team rested.
“The age of the players on the team is not a consideration so much as you just need time to rest and recover,” Bylsma said. “Just maximizing the opportunities when you go on the ice. You don't want to practice and waste energy.”
Bylsma gave the Penguins a day off on Friday, although they traveled to New York. He also gave them off Wednesday, the day before Game 5. The Penguins' morning skate was optional on the day of Game 4.
Bylsma acknowledged that his morning skates — more detailed than most teams' — gives him the luxury of skipping practices.
Letang credited with assist
The NHL has made a scoring change, adding an assist to defenseman Kris Letang on center Brandon Sutter's goal in Game 4. With six points in the series, Letang now is tied with Ottawa's Erik Karlsson for the lead among defensemen in the playoffs before Friday night's games.
Odds and ends
Bylsma said no lineup information will be given before Game 6 but hinted that goalie Tomas Vokoun will get his second consecutive start. ... If Game 7 is needed, it will begin at 7 p.m. Sunday at Consol Energy Center.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.