Islanders notebook: Team remains focused in moment
UNIONDALE, N.Y. — No panic.
That was the theme emanating from the New York Islanders' locker room Friday morning following an optional skate and video study at Nassau Coliseum.
The Islanders trail the top-seeded Penguins, 3-2, in the best-of-seven Eastern Conference quarterfinal series after being routed, 4-0, on Thursday night at Consol Energy Center. Game 6 is Saturday night on Long Island.
It will mark the first time since April 28, 2002, that a team could clinch a series on Coliseum ice. The Islanders defeated the Toronto Maple Leafs, 5-3, that day in Game 6 of an Eastern Conference quarterfinal to force a Game 7. Toronto won Game 7, 4-2, at Air Canada Centre.
“We've been in these must-win situations before,” coach Jack Capuano said. “Our guys have responded pretty well. We're at home. Hopefully we'll have that barn rocking again, like we had the previous two games, where we can feed off (the crowd) and just be ready to win a hockey game.”
Nabokov keeps job
Evgeni Nabokov will not join Marc-Andre Fleury on the bench.
Capuano announced Nabokov will be in goal Saturday. Nabokov has struggled in the series, posting a 4.69 goals-against average and .847 save percentage and was pulled in Games 1 and 5 in favor of reserve Kevin Poulin.
“I (have) confidence in Nabokov to go with him. He'll start. There's no surprise. Just move along with him,” Capuano said. “He's a veteran guy. He's probably harder on himself than anyone else. He knows how he has to play.”
Center Frans Nielsen is a game-time decision with a lower-body injury. Defenseman Andrew MacDonald is out six to eight weeks after having surgery on his hand.
Denis Gorman is a freelance writer.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.