Islanders' Tavares humbled by Hart nomination
When New York Islanders center John Tavares boarded the team's airplane after a Game 5 loss to the Penguins, he received this message from assistant coach Doug Weight: “Come see me.”
“I figured it had to do with the game,” Tavares said.
The news was much better. Weight wanted to be the first to congratulate Tavares for his nomination for the Hart Trophy, awarded to the NHL's most valuable player.
He joins the Penguins' Sidney Crosby and Alex Ovechkin of the Capitals as nominees. The winner will be named in late June.
“I was a little shocked,” Tavares said. “A lot of emotion. Just because of the game, disappointed. But, you know, it's a great honor, tremendous honor to be recognized, especially with those two guys and what great players they are.”
“It's nice, and I'm sure I'll have time to celebrate later,” Ovechkin told reporters in Washington. “But now it's all about business.”
Tavares, the No. 1 overall draft choice in 2009, finished third in the regular season with 28 goals, behind Ovechkin (32) and Tampa Bay's Steven Stamkos (29).
Islanders coach Jack Capuano said Tavares is the chief reason the Islanders reached the playoffs and remain alive for Game 6 Saturday at Nassau Coliseum.
“Let's face it. If John Tavares didn't have the season that he had, we're probably not in the situation that we're in,” Capuano said. “When we need a big goal, he's been there for us.”
Tavares didn't tell many people of the honor.
“Just people close to me,” he said. “When I was told, I let my parents know. (They) are a big part of this since I first put on the skates when I was 3 years old.”
Tavares was more concerned about the timing of the announcement.
“I'm trying to stay in the moment and stay as focused as I can with the big game this weekend,” he said.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.