Penguins notebook: Crosby up for third award
Crosby up for 3rd award
Captain Sidney Crosby, who missed the final 12 contests of this regular season because of a broken jaw, has been nominated for the Masterton Trophy, which is issued annually to the player who has displayed the most perseverance, dedication and sportsmanship.
“I think whether you're nominated or not, you miss any extended period of time or go through a tough injury, any time you can get back to playing hockey and get back to what you love to do — that's a big honor itself,” Crosby said
Crosby also has been dominated for the Hart Trophy and the Ted Lindsay Award.
The Penguins scratched defenseman Simon Despres, who played Games 3, 5 and 6 in the quarterfinals against the Islanders.
Defenseman Deryk Engelland, out since Game 2 against the Islanders because of spotty play, replaced him. Defenseman Mark Eaton, left wing Tanner Glass, right wing Beau Bennett and center Jussi Jokinen were other healthy scratches.
The five Penguins' Round 1 games on Root Sports Pittsburgh posted an average Nielsen rating of 21.3, or about 665,600 local viewers per contest, Nielsen Media Research confirmed. It was the highest-rated first round in the cable network's history.
Center Sidney Crosby continues to wear protective gear to cover his surgically repaired jaw.
That protection worked Tuesday. Crosby was punched by Senators right winger Chris Neil in the third period. Neil was not penalized. Crosby said it was not the first time he had been punched near the jaw by an opponent.
— Josh Yohe and Rob Rossi
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.