Penguins' depth allows for fine-tuned, strategic lineups in playoffs
Penguins coach Dan Bylsma has been clear about refusing to discuss his lineup this postseason. Perhaps there is wisdom in this decision.
After all, the Penguins' lineup is almost never the same from one night to the next, which has become quite a weapon.
When general manager Ray Shero bludgeoned his counterparts during the trade deadline period, he not only handed Bylsma an excessive amount of star power but also unprecedented depth.
The Penguins have 26 players at their disposal, and they're using them all.
“I have never been on a team with this kind of depth,” defenseman Matt Niskanen said. “(Defenseman Mark Eaton) had been playing 20 minutes a game and playing really well. That tells you how many good defensemen are here.”
Eaton's situation illustrates the flexible nature of the Penguins' lineup. The veteran has played 27 games this season, and the Penguins have won 22 of them. But Eaton, who isn't a speedster, struggled with the quick Islanders' forwards. He hasn't played since, as rookie Simon Despres was inserted into the lineup in Games 5 and 6 against the Islanders.
When the more-physical Ottawa Senators arrived for Round 2, defenseman Deryk Engelland, a tough customer, replaced Despres.
And so the rotation goes, players entering and exiting the lineup based largely on the opposition's strengths. It's an unorthodox approach, but the Penguins' depth is rare.
“We have nine legitimate NHL defensemen right now,” assistant coach Todd Reirden said. “We have faith in all of them. Given the situation, we may need them. It's not a ‘for sure' six guys, but we like them all. There are lots of (variables), whether we're at home or on the road, given the opponent. We have lots of things we can do.”
This philosophy is considerably different from the Penguins' approach during their 2009 Stanley Cup run. Back then, it was given that three defensive pairs — Sergei Gonchar/Brooks Orpik, Eaton/Kris Letang and Rob Scuderi/Hal Gill — would be in the lineup. The top three lines, centered by Sidney Crosby, Evgeni Malkin and Jordan Staal, never changed.
Through seven playoff games this season, Letang already has seen regular shifts with Paul Martin, Eaton, Despres and Niskanen.
When the Penguins were hungry to shut down Islanders star John Tavares, for instance, Bylsma played his two best skating defensemen, Letang and Martin, together.
“But we're all pretty flexible,” Niskanen said. “I don't think it bothers any of us.”
It might also make the Penguins more difficult to prepare for.
“Obviously they have a lot of depth, a lot of good players,” Ottawa coach Paul MacLean said.
And they aren't afraid to use them.
The Penguins already have used 15 forwards, eight defensemen and two goalies in seven playoff games. Only rookie defenseman Robert Bortuzzo hasn't played.
Assessing the Penguins' depth requires only a look at their current healthy scratches.
In Game 2, these players figure to sit out:
• Left wing Tanner Glass, who played in every regular-season game.
• Right wing Beau Bennett, who ignited Consol Energy Center with the postseason's first goal against the Islanders.
• Jussi Jokinen, who has 13 points in 14 games with the Penguins.
• Eaton, who is among the team's best penalty killers.
• Despres, a talented two-way defenseman who has excelled most of the season.
“I've never been on a team with this kind of talent and these kinds of players,” Niskanen said.
Nor has he been on a team that changes defensive pairings, line combinations and personnel every night.
The plan seems to be working.
“It's been good for us,” Engelland said. “And having competition just to get into the lineup doesn't hurt.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.