Penguins notebook: Jokinen's faceoff skills may be needed
Jokinen could help on faceoffs
OTTAWA — The Penguins have won only 45 percent of their faceoffs against the Ottawa Senators through three games in the best-of-seven series.
Center Jussi Jokinen might be called upon to improve that percentage when the Penguins and Senators meet in Game 4.
Jokinen, a scratch during the past five playoff games, is a noted faceoff specialist. Coach Dan Bylsma said Monday the Penguins have endured particular struggles in the left faceoff circle and Jokinen likely could help them in that department.
It remains unknown if Jokinen has been a healthy scratch or if he is dealing with a health issue. Including the playoffs, the center has registered 13 points in 14 games with the Penguins since being acquired April 3.
“He's a guy who has played big games,” said Bylsma. “It's tough having him not in there with our lineup. But we haven't decided on our lineup for Game 4 yet.”
Vitale could play
Center Joe Vitalemight be able to participate in Game 4. Vitale, another strong faceoff performer, missed Game 3 with an unknown injury. Bylsma said it is “likely” that Vitale will practice with the Penguins on Tuesday.
Bylsma said he has been pleased with the energy and physical play Vitale has brought since being inserted in Game 5 against the Islanders.
The Penguins and the Senators gave their players an off day Monday. Both teams will practice at Scotiabank Place on Tuesday. Bylsma, defensemanBrooks Orpik, left wing Chris Kunitz and left wing Brenden Morrow spoke to the media.
More tickets on sale
— Josh Yohe
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.