Senators notebook: MacLean impressed by Ottawa fans
Ottawa Senators coach Paul MacLean's NHL playing days had stops in Winnipeg, Detroit and St. Louis. Detroit, often called Hockeytown, is among his coaching stops. MacLean said the enthusiasm of Ottawa fans takes a backseat to nobody.
“The fans are great,” he said. “In and around the city, you can't go anywhere ... there's a buzz. It's every bit as exciting as Hockeytown has ever been, maybe even more. In a Canadian city, it's way different than being in a U.S. city in the Stanley Cup playoffs. It's a lot of fun right now.”
Sens' captain up for award
Senators captain Daniel Alfredsson is a finalist — along with Los Angeles' Dustin Brown and Chicago's Jonathan Toews — for the Mark Messier Leadership award, presented to the player who “exemplifies great leadership qualities to his team, on and off the ice during the regular season.”
Time on Pens' side
An interesting stat from sportsnet.ca's Ian Mendes: Total time playing with the lead in this series: Penguins, 124:45; Ottawa, 0:00. Impressive, yes, but the series is still only 2-1 in the Penguins' favor and the Senators are gaining confidence.
No answers on Neil
There was no update available on the status of Senators winger Chris Neil, who left Sunday's game in the second period after injuring his left arm crashing into the boards. “I haven't seen him (today),” said MacLean. “As far as I know, he's still not available.”
Dancing with the stars
Evgeni Malkin was at his dancing best during parts of Sunday's game, but he couldn't find the net. “He's a great player, he danced around a couple of guys in overtime,” said Senators goalie Craig Anderson. “He's the type of player who's a gamebreaker. I thought we did a really good job of eliminating his quality scoring chances.”
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.