Share This Page

Penguins notebook: Morrow sits; Bylsma changes lineup

| Wednesday, May 22, 2013, 2:33 p.m.
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
The Penguins' Joe Vitale collides with Senators goaltender Craig Anderson during the third period Tuesday, May 14, 2013, at Consol Energy Center.

Morrow out as lineup changes

OTTAWA — The Penguins played Game 4 of their second-round Stanley Cup playoff series with an old-look third line.

Matt Cooke worked the left side with center Brandon Sutter and right winger Tyler Kennedy against Ottawa on Wednesday. Cooke switched sides because regular third-line left winger Brenden Morrow did not play.

Morrow left a practice Tuesday favoring his left arm. He has not been available for comment, per club policy on injured players. Also, coach Dan Bylsma has taken to not providing injury updates during the playoffs.

The Cooke-Sutter-Kennedy line was a staple during the regular season before March trades for Morrow, winger Jarome Iginla and forward Jussi Jokinen.

Back again

Jokinen and winger Beau Bennett played in Game 4. Neither had dressed since Round 1. Both skilled forwards skated on a line with forward Craig Adams.

The Penguins' scored a postseason-low one goal in their Game 3 loss.

Vitale clarity

Bylsma said center Joe Vitale's performance on faceoffs in Round 2 is the reason he is no longer in the lineup.

Vitale, a club-best 61.1 percent on faceoffs in the regular season, won only 9 of 21 draws in Games 1 and 2. Vitale did not play in Games 3 and 4 after appearing in four straight contests — all Penguins' wins — dating to joining the lineup for Game 5 in Round 1.

Bylsma said Sunday that Vitale was “not available” for Game 3, declining to provide specifics. Vitale said Wednesday he had “a hiccup” to a previous lower-body injury but that his absence was “no health thing.”

— Rob Rossi

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.