Share This Page

Senators notebook: Anderson will remain in goal

| Thursday, May 23, 2013, 5:06 p.m.

Anderson will remain in net

OTTAWA — After letting in six goals in Wednesday's 7-3 loss, Senators goalie Craig Anderson will be back between the pipes Friday night.

Asked if he had any doubt he'd play, Anderson said: “I don't think so. I don't know why there would be.”

“Andy's stood on his head, he's been phenomenal, he's done great things all year,” center Jason Spezza said. “He gives us a chance to win every night. To expect him to make save after save from point-blank range is unrealistic.”

Alfredsson hits 100

Lost in Wednesday's debacle was that Daniel Alfredsson's third-period goal was his 100th career playoff point. He picked up the puck as a souvenir for his kids ... and took some heat. “Could this be my last season, my last playoffs? I don't know,” Alfredsson said. “I don't collect sticks or keep a lot of memorabilia at home, so there's no specific reason (I picked it up).”

Karlsson: It's not over

Defenseman Erik Karlsson said while the Penguins are good, the Senators aren't waving the white flag. “You can't just roll over and die,” he said. “We had the lead for some time, and that's a good thing, but we have to get back to basics and work harder. They played some great hockey. Sometimes there's not much you can do.”

Game sheet sums it up

Coach Paul MacLean didn't have much to say at his press conference following Wednesday's game.

He held up a game sheet then said, “Everything's right here. It's 7-3. We're going to Pittsburgh, and we're coming to play. Good night.” And he walked away.

“I think the coach was just as frustrated as the players were,” Spezza said.

Lead? What lead?

While the Senators had a 2-1 lead on the Penguins, MacLean wasn't buying in. “When I watched the game, we had the lead but we weren't exactly playing that great,” he said. “I thought we were playing in our end quite a bit — more than we were playing in their end. We had the lead, but I don't think we were dictating or dominating in any way.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.