Penguins to face Bruins in Eastern Conference final
Jarome Iginla picked the Steel City over the Old Towne in March.
The Eastern Conference final will determine if he chose wisely.
The Penguins and Boston Bruins will battle for a berth in the Stanley Cup Final in a best-of-seven series. Dates and times are to be determined.
The Bruins eliminated the New York Rangers on Saturday, winning that series in five games. The Penguins ousted the Ottawa Senators on Friday, also in five games.
The top-seeded Penguins own home-ice advantage over the fourth-seeded Bruins, against whom they went 3-0-0 in the regular season. Center Evgeni Malkin, tied for the club-lead and second overall in playoff scoring with 16 points, did not play in any of those games for the Penguins.
Iginla played in just one, scoring a goal in the Penguins' 3-2 win at Boston that clinched the No. 1 seed on April 20.
Bruins general manager Peter Chiarelli said he had a deal in place with Calgary to acquire Iginla in the day before the trade deadline. Iginla, then Calgary's captain, had a contractual clause that allowed him to control his next employer, and he opted for a trade to the Penguins on March 28.
Iginla began Sunday as the NHL's fifth-leading playoff scorer with 12 points.
After losing out on Iginla, Chiarelli traded for winger Jaromir Jagr, who starred for the Penguins from 1990-2001, winning five scoring titles and an MVP.
Jagr returned to the NHL last season with the Philadelphia Flyers, who upset the Penguins in Round 1 of the 2012 playoffs.
The Penguins (2009) and Bruins (2011) are the two last Eastern Conference teams to win the Cup.
The franchises have not played in the postseason since the Penguins won Prince of Wales Conference finals in 1991 and 1992.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.