Physical style of imposing Bruins just fine with Iginla
Jarome Iginla is ready for a battering.
Physicality — a part of the Boston Bruins' DNA for about 40 years, and especially now — is not something from which Iginla will shy away in the Eastern Conference final.
Actually, he will take it any day over more questions about his decision to play for the Penguins instead of the club that stands between them and a return to the Stanley Cup Final.
“Well, I do like to get engaged physically — in the corner, to bump and be bumped,” Iginla said Wednesday after the Penguins practiced at Consol Energy Center. “I do like to play that style of hockey, and I know we're going to have no shortage of it in this series.”
Iginla has scored four goals and recorded 12 points in the playoffs. He has yet to produce a signature moment like those that turned him into an icon with the Calgary Flames.
He agreed to leave Calgary in March to join the Penguins. He wanted to chase the Cup that has eluded him over 16 NHL seasons, and the Penguins — led by former MVP and scoring-champion centers Sidney Crosby and Evgeni Malkin — provided him the best chance, Iginla said.
He had nothing personal against the Bruins, whose general manager Peter Chiarelli said he had a deal with Calgary that was nixed by Iginla.
“When I was faced with that choice, I was fortunate a couple of really good teams were interested,” Iginla said. “I guessed it was a possibility it would be this case.”
In March, Iginla assessed the Penguins as a deeper squad, one for which he would not be required to carry among the heaviest loads along a path toward the Cup.
The Bruins' defense — a black-and-gold forest of 6-footers led by captain Zdeno Chara (6-9) — stands as a considerable road block.
That defense corps, despite injuries that forced smaller contributors (Torey Krug) into the lineup, had its way with physically imposing New York Rangers forwards in Round 2. Rick Nash, one of the dominant power forwards of the past decade, was rarely noticeable for the Rangers.
Nash, though, had never played in the second round.
Iginla is hardened mentally by a Game 7 in the Cup Final (2003) and is quite familiar with opponents trying to take him on physically from all angles over a best-of-seven series.
The Bruins would do him a favor by trying that approach.
“The more physical, and the more you go on adrenaline and intensity, for myself, personally, it takes away the thinking,” Iginla said. “And that's a good thing for my game.”
That should work for Malkin and right winger James Neal, too.
That dangerous duo — Malkin and Neal were first-team All-Stars last season — finished Round 2 formidably. Neal scored five goals over Games 4 and 5. Malkin played poised between the hashes while also adding a goal and an assist.
Opponents often try to frustrate Malkin and Neal into a state in which they may choose force over the flow that benefits their natural skills.
Iginla, playing the opposite side with Malkin and Neal, is on their line in part to help keep them composed. Also, coach Dan Bylsma said, he'll serve as a deterrent in case a member of the opposition tries to prove who's bad.
“This is more based on when I played against Jarome than what you can visibly see on the ice, but you don't mess around when this guy's on the ice,” Bylsma said.
“He's a fierce competitor. He sets the tone. There's not a lot of people who aren't put in check when Jarome's on the ice.”
The Bruins knew that in March.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.