Penguins notebook: Center Sutter eager to produce points
Sutter eager to produce
Center Brandon Sutter knows it is time to produce.
The Boston Bruins are among hockey's finest defensive teams, and will use considerable energy to slow down the Penguins' powerful top two lines.
If Boston is successful at slowing down the forward units led by centers Sidney Crosby and Evgeni Malkin, it will behoove Sutter's third line to produce.
“Our line can't just play defense,” Sutter said. “We need to score goals. We know it.”
Sutter has gone seven games without a point and has only mustered one goal and one assist in 12 playoff games. He has recorded only 21 shots and 12 hits in those games while winning 50 percent of his faceoffs.
He was far more productive during the regular season. In his first 48 games after being traded from the Carolina Hurricanes, Sutter scored 11 goals.
Left wing Matt Cooke is a plus-5 this postseason and has delivered 49 hits. However, he is without a goal in 12 games.
Right wing Tyler Kennedy, back on the third line after a forgettable regular season, has scored twice in the playoffs but just once in his past seven games.
Sutter believes the production will come soon from him and the third line.
“The big thing is that we are getting some more chances,” he said. “I'd be more worried if we weren't creating any chances, but we have been.”
The Penguins held an optional practice Sunday at Consol Energy Center. Most players who participated in Game 1 against Boston did not participate. The exceptions were goalie Tomas Vokoun, Cooke and right wing Craig Adams.
— Josh Yohe
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.