Penguins notebook: Shero gives Vokoun vote of confidence
• No one in Penguins management has completely endorsed Tomas Vokoun as the starting goaltender for the remainder of the playoffs. General manager Ray Shero, though, gave Vokoun quite a vote of confidence Friday. Shero spoke candidly about Game 5 against the Islanders, when Vokoun started in place of struggling starter Marc-Andre Fleury and blanked the Islanders. “Without having a Tomas Vokoun to go to in Game 5 of the Islanders series ...,” Shero said, “I'm not sure what happens. I'm not sure we don't win. But I'm not sure we do.” Shero said that the Penguins knew they had acquired a superb goaltender in Vokoun last year. His reputation, Shero insists, is simply underrated because he has played primarily in small markets. “He's been one of the better goaltenders in the National Hockey League,” Shero said. “He was just playing in Nashville and Florida for a long time.” Vokoun appreciates the vote of support for Shero but isn't taking any time to enjoy the praise. “We talked about me coming here and helping the team,” Vokoun said. “I'm trying to do what they wanted me to do. My job was always to stay ready in case they're going to need me. It's always nice when people say nice things about you, but I'm just doing my job.”
• The Penguins practiced extensively on special teams Friday. Their top power play included Sidney Crosby, Evgeni Malkin, James Neal, Chris Kunitz and Kris Letang. Jarome Iginla played on the second unit.
• For the second consecutive day, the Penguins practiced with a full squad with no apparent signs of injuries.
— Josh Yohe
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.