Penguins notebook: Bylsma alters Pens lineup
Coach Dan Bylsma didn't miss a chance to try something different in the Eastern Conference final.
Defenseman Mark Eaton and right winger Tyler Kennedy were scratched for Game 2 against Boston at Consol Energy Center on Monday. Defenseman Deryk Engelland and center Joe Vitale were the replacements.
Vitale, 56.8 percent on faceoffs for his career, played to offset the Bruins' dominance on draws. Boston won 67 percent of faceoffs in its Game 1 victory Saturday.
Engelland was one of the Penguins' most physical defensemen during the regular season, finishing second to Brooks Orpik at that position with 70 hits. Engelland had only four hits in as many playoff games before Game 2.
The Penguins were credited with 34 hits in Game 1, but only eight came from defensemen.
NHL commissioner Gary Bettman attended Game 2. He has traveled to playoff cities throughout the postseason.
Also at Consol Energy Center on Monday was Penguins majority co-owner Ron Burkle, who spends much of his time living in London. Burkle has attended several playoff games, including road contests in Uniondale, N.Y., during Round 1.
The Penguins surrendered the opening goal for the second game. That happened only once during Round 2 against Ottawa. The Penguins were 3-2 in the playoffs when opponents scored first.
The Penguins have trailed by multiple goals only four times in the playoffs, but it has happened twice in as many games against Boston.
— Rob Rossi
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.