ShareThis Page

Left winger Marchand leads Bruins over Penguins

| Monday, June 3, 2013, 11:57 p.m.
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
The Bruins' David Krejci (46) celebrates his goal with Nathan Horton during the first period against the Penguins on Monday, June 3, 2013, at Consol Energy Center.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
The Bruins' Brad Marchand beats Penguins goaltender Tomas Vokoun for a first-period goal during Game 2 of the Eastern Conference final Monday, June 3, 2013, at Consol Energy Center.

First, James Neal.

Then, the Penguins' comeback hopes.

Now, quite possibly, the Penguins chances of going to the Stanley Cup Final.

Boston Bruins left wing Brad Marchand has crushed nearly everything that has come across his path in the Eastern Conference final.

Marchand scored two goals in the first period Monday night — matching his total for the previous 13 games of this NHL postseason — to lead the Bruins to a 6-1 victory against the Penguins at Consol Energy Center on Monday night.

The Bruins went home Tuesday morning with a 2-0 lead in the best-of-seven series looking to all but eliminate the Penguins in Game 3 on Wednesday at TD Garden.

Marchand refused to admit as much after the game, but his goal 25 seconds after the Penguins had trimmed a 3-0 lead to 3-1 late in the first period might have been the turning point of the series.

The Penguins had rallied with a Brandon Sutter goal and the entry of goaltender Marc-Andre Fleury to replace the struggling Tomas Vokoun, and the Consol crowd was finally getting to use its throats.

But Marchand took a pass from Patrice Bergeron, who had accepted one from Jaromir Jagr, and found a spot behind Fleury.

“I took a hit,” Jagr said, “and went out 2-on-1, and Marchand had confidence about his shot and he scored in the top shelf on the left side, so he tried the right side this time.”

It was Marchand's second goal of the game; he scored 28 seconds from the opening faceoff to give the Bruins a quick 1-0 lead and control of the proceedings.

Marchand, who was penalized for a boarding penalty on Neal in Game 1 on Saturday, said he could see the life leave the Penguins at that point.

“Yeah, it was good for us,” Marchand said. “They were getting some momemtum off that (Sutter) goal there, and we did a good job of kind of crushing that,” he said.

“It's tough when you score a big goal when you are down a few, and a team scores right after,” he said. “We were happy to be able to do that.”

When NHL historians sit down to write the story of the 2013 Bruins, there should be one chapter devoted solely to nine minutes and 51 seconds of the night of May 13.

“There is no doubt in my mind that was the real turning point,” Bruins coach Claude Julien said.

But let's not forget or minimize the 19-minute stretch Monday in the first period. The Bruins scored four goals, riding a three-week wave of momentum that stretched all the way from Boston's TD Garden to Madison Square Garden to Pittsburgh.

It started in Game 7 of a first-round playoff series against the Toronto Maple Leafs. The Bruins were on the brink of blowing a 3-1 lead in the best-of-seven series after losing 2-1 decisions in Games 5 and 6.

The Maple Leafs had built a 4-1 lead through more than 2 12 periods of the decisive game. A second consecutive first-round playoff exit appeared unavoidable.

Then the Bruins rallied against the Maple Leafs, scoring three goals in 9:51 to tie the score. Bergeron scored the tying goal with 51 seconds left in the third period and the game- and series-winner in overtime.

“We showed some character coming back in that game,” Bergeron said. “It felt good.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.