ShareThis Page

Penguins' 5-step plan to salvaging series versus Bruins

| Wednesday, June 5, 2013, 12:01 a.m.
The Bruins' Rich Peverley upends the Penguins' James Neal during the second period Monday, June 3, 2013, at Consol Energy Center.
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
The Bruins' Rich Peverley upends the Penguins' James Neal during the second period Monday, June 3, 2013, at Consol Energy Center.

Sidney Crosby knows the Stanley Cup playoffs can end with a whimper.

That doesn't mean they must end in disappointment.

He failed to produce a point in the final three games of the 2009 Cup Final, but the Penguins won two of those and the title.

The Penguins came up short in 2007 and '12 — the other postseasons Crosby finished without a point in multiple games.

He has yet to produce a point in the Eastern Conference final, which resumes with Game 3 on Wednesday in Boston. The Penguins trail the best-of-seven series, 2-0.

Crosby has scored a goal in just one of the past five games — his worst playoff stretch since scoring in one of the Penguins' last eight playoff games in 2010.

The Penguins also need to make these adjustments to beat the Big Bad Bruins:

Try something new-ish

Lineup changes are coming for Game 3, coach Dan Bylsma said. Details weren't provided, but moving Jarome Iginla to his natural position — right wing — is one place to start.

That doesn't mean Iginla should play on the top line with Crosby. Iginla can't keep up with Crosby, which is vital for any winger who plays with him.

Against the Bruins, Iginla would fit better on a third line that includes Brenden Morrow on the left wing and Jussi Jokinen at center. That line worked well — especially on the cycle — late in the regular season when Crosby (jaw) and Evgeni Malkin (shoulder) were injured.

With Morrow and Iginla — both physical players — as his wingers, Jokinen could become an X-factor against the Bruins. He scored three goals against them in a 2009 playoff series win with Carolina, and he produced three points in the Penguins' regular-season win at Boston.

Also, rookie Beau Bennett needs to play.

The Penguins' best bet to win this series is to maximize their skill and speed advantage — as did Toronto in Round 1, nearly upsetting the Bruins in seven games while rallying from a 3-1 series deficit.

Skate more, hit less

This isn't 2009, when wingers could freely treat back-turning defensemen like pylons. Obstruction has crept back into the NHL, and those “Kunikaze” hits that Kunitz perfected during the Cup run four years ago are harder to pull off.

Kunitz and Cooke, the two wingers who starred in that role four years ago, are 33 and 34, respectively. They have combined to play in 586 games, including playoffs, over the past four seasons.

The Penguins seem obsessed with showing off their physicality in this series. They have outhit the Bruins, 71-38.

Toronto tried poking the Bruins early in its first-round series and promptly fell behind, 3-1. In Game 4, though, the Maple Leafs made Boston captain Zdeno Chara a target but otherwise forced Bruins players to keep up with their skill and speed.

Chasing wears down an opponent, too. The Penguins have done enough of that against the Bruins — all, unfathomably, in the pursuit of punishment.

Pay attention

The Penguins' midseason defensive turnaround — at one point they jumped from 22nd to seventh in goals allowed — was because of a tactical adjustment. Their “F3,” the third forward entering the defensive zone, worked deeper than before, leaving defensemen free to protect the crease and slot scoring areas.

The addition of Douglas Murray, another in-season trade acquisition, bolstered the physicality on the back end, but the Penguins remain a defense corps whose strength is positioning, puck movement and skating.

Defensemen, as was the case against the pace-controlling Islanders in a tight Round 1 matchup, are skating backward too much and too deep — almost, at times against the Bruins, into their goalie.

That is a telltale sign the Penguins are defending against transition offense too often, something that rarely occurred in a sound second-round performance against Ottawa.

Nothing would help the Penguins more than responsible decision-making by forwards, who are admittedly pressing to create against the Bruins' trapping and collapsing schemes.

Turn to Fleury

Journeyman Tomas Vokoun was pulled from Game 2 after allowing three goals, but only because the Penguins needed a spark. He's 6-3 with a .929 save percentage and has done nothing to deserve a demotion.

Still, this moment calls for Marc-Andre Fleury.

He was the franchise goalie when the playoffs started. The Penguins need to find out if he's still up for that job. They can't if he is inserted into games only when they need a spark.

This series still can be won, and it has shifted to Boston, where Fleury is 5-1-0 with a 1.67 goals-against average and .946 save percentage over the past five seasons.

Fleury was the reason his club won a Game 7 on the road in a Cup Final. No other goalie still playing can claim that. If nothing else, general manager Ray Shero needs to know if Fleury is still that goalie.

Rob Rossi is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @RobRossi_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.