ShareThis Page

Pens' union representative unhappy with visor policy

| Wednesday, June 5, 2013, 12:27 p.m.
Bruins goaltender Tuukka Rask makes a first-period save on the Penguins' Craig Adams during Game 3 of the Eastern Conference finals Wednesday, June 5, 2013, at TD Garden in Boston.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Bruins goaltender Tuukka Rask makes a first-period save on the Penguins' Craig Adams during Game 3 of the Eastern Conference finals Wednesday, June 5, 2013, at TD Garden in Boston.

BOSTON — The NHL competition committee is recommending that players entering the league be required to wear a visor.

Penguins right wing Craig Adams, the team's union representative, said the decision should remain with the players.

“It's always been the player's choice,” Adams said Wednesday, hours before the Penguins and Boston Bruins played in Game 3 of the Eastern Conference final. “How hypocritical is it of me to say I'm not going to wear one, but I'm going to make everyone else wear one?”

The competition committee wants the rule to be instituted at the beginning of next season. The league's board of governors must approve the change.

In March, Rangers defenseman Marc Staal sustained an eye injury when he was struck by a puck. He missed about two months but attempted to return for the postseason. He played in just one game.

Staal's brothers, Eric and Jordan, started wearing a visor because of the injury. So did Penguins defenseman Brooks Orpik.

Many players insist a visor interferes with their ability to see, and others have said breathing is more difficult while wearing one.

“Maybe in 10 years, everyone will look back and say how dumb we were for not wearing visors,” Adams said. “To me, it's a personal decision. I don't feel like I should tell anyone else they have to do it.”

Adams is surprised so many seem to be in favor of the ruling.

“Unfortunately, we've had some bad injuries,” he said. “I'm sure some guys took that into account.”

A few Penguins — Adams, defenseman Deryk Engelland, left wing Tanner Glass and left wing Brenden Morrow — don't wear visors.

One of the youngest Penguins wouldn't think of not wearing one.

“I don't have to wear one, but I'll do so my entire career. It's for safety reasons,” right wing Beau Bennett said. “It's not a big deal.

“It always takes something happening for something to spur interest in it. Something did happen to bring up the issue again. You see a couple of more guys put it on just from seeing that.

“You don't think it's going to happen to you, but if something does, you'll regret it.”

Bennett wore a full face cage in college, per NCAA rules. It actually was comfortable, he said, and made him feel safer.

As for a visor, Bennett said it is a case of common sense.

“I'll wear one the rest of my career,” he said.

Josh Yohe is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @JoshYohe_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.