Share This Page

Penguins notebook: As promised, Bylsma changes up

| Wednesday, June 5, 2013, 9:54 p.m.

Iginla back at right wing

Coach Dan Bylsma delivered on his promise for changes.

Jarome Iginla began Game 3 of the Eastern Conference final playing right wing — his position before joining the Penguins — on a line with left winger Brenden Morrow, who also was acquired before the trade deadline. Brandon Sutter was the center.

Iginla and Morrow played together late in the regular season when the Penguins were without centers Sidney Crosby and Evgeni Malkin. Jussi Jokinen was the center in those games, including a win at Boston that clinched the No. 1 seed in the East.

Jokinen was a healthy scratch for Game 3 after playing in four consecutive contests. He was without a point in his past three games.

Iginla had played the opposite wing with Malkin and right winger James Neal. Matt Cooke, the regular left winger for Sutter, joined Malkin and Neal on the second scoring line.

Rookie up

Winger Beau Bennett returned to the lineup after not playing since Game 4 of Round 2. He replaced Jokinen and played on the fourth line with forwards Craig Adams and Joe Vitale.

First down

The Penguins began the East final having allowed the first goal only once in 11 Stanley Cup playoff games.

That trend is a memory.

Center David Krejci scored one minute, 42 seconds into Game 3, giving the Bruins the opening goal in every game this series.

Two of those goals were scored early. Winger Brad Marchand scored 28 seconds into Game 2 at Consol Energy Center.

History lesson

A Penguins squad has not been swept in a best-of-seven playoff series since a 1979 Stanley Cup quarterfinal against Boston. That is a span of 44 consecutive series.

— Rob Rossi

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.