Share This Page

Pens-Bruins Game 3 most-watched conference final in 11 years

| Thursday, June 6, 2013, 7:57 p.m.

The Penguins' double-overtime loss to Boston in Game 3 of the Eastern Conference final Wednesday night was the most-watched conference final game in more than a decade.

The game attracted 2.844 million average viewers on NBC Sports Network, peaking with 3.6 million viewers from 10:30 to 10:45 p.m., according to Nielsen ratings provided by the network.

It was the most-watched conference final since 2002, when Detroit-Colorado averaged more than three million viewers.

The overall average national household rating was 1.64, slightly higher (1.78) from midnight until the end of the game.

More people watched the game in Pittsburgh — it drew a 22.71 rating — than anywhere in the country. That rating was 5 percent higher than the series average for the Penguins' last conference final appearance in 2009.

Game 3 drew a 21.89 rating in Boston. That was up 47 percent from the series average for the Bruins' 2011 conference final appearance.

One rating point equals about 12,000 households and 30,000 viewers in the Pittsburgh market, which extends north toward Erie, south through Morgantown, W.Va., west to the Ohio border and east toward Altoona.

That translates to about 656,700 viewers in the Pittsburgh market.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.