Bruins notebook: Daugavins gets his shot in lineup
Daugavins gets his shot
BOSTON — The Boston Bruins' health among forwards throughout the Stanley Cup playoffs had relegated Kaspars Daugavins, Jay Pandolfo and Carl Soderberg to healthy scratches since the start of the postseason.
Gregory Campbell's broken right fibula in Game 3 opened a spot for one of the seldom-used forwards.
Bruins coach Claude Julien went with Daugavins, a waiver-wire pick-up March 27. In the regular season, he skated in six games for Boston and recorded one assist.
“He's a gritty player,” Julien said. “He's strong on the puck, strong as an individual, he can shoot the puck. (He's) got a lot of qualities. We've always said we've got depth on this team. We showed it when injuries crept up on defense. Now, we've got an injury up front. He's going to have to step in and do his job.”
Julien was alluding to the way his team overcame injuries to Andrew Ference, Dennis Seidenberg and Wade Redden on defense and beat the Rangers in the second round by plugging in rookies Torey Krug, Matt Bartkowski and Dougie Hamilton.
If all you looked at was the 11:35 of ice time Campbell averaged this postseason, you'd think he was easy to replace. But in the Bruins' four-line attack, Campbell has been huge in the postseason with three goals, seven points and a 50.5 success rate on faceoffs. He's also a key member of the Bruins' penalty kill, which was 15 for 15 against the Penguins' power play in the series.
“He plays such a hard game,” Bruins forward Brad Marchand said. “He's such a big part of our team and especially you saw the last couple of rounds, he's been very big.”
— Matt Kalman
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.