Share This Page

Penguins notebook: Crosby hit hard by Paille

| Friday, June 7, 2013, 9:42 p.m.

Crosby hit hard by Paille

BOSTON — Captain Sidney Crosby was leveled by a hard hit from Boston's Daniel Paille early in Game 4 of the Eastern Conference final Friday at TD Garden.

Crosby had just crossed into the offensive zone when Paille caught him from the blindside. Paille skated into Crosby, whose head was turned toward action at the other end of the ice. No penalty was called.

Crosby's neck snapped in a whiplash motion when he hit the ice.

He did not miss a shift immediately after the hit, but he was checked often by trainer Chris Stewart.

Players showing signs of concussion symptoms are required to be removed from the game setting to spend time in a quiet room before gaining clearance from a trained medical professional to return.

“It didn't feel good,” Crosby said. “But it was OK. Knocked the wind out of me. It was way out of the play. I think it's a penalty. It may have been so far from the play that they didn't see it.”

Orpik back

Defenseman Brooks Orpik played in Game 4 even though he finished the previous contest worse for wear after a hit from Milan Lucic of the Bruins. That hit — near the conclusion of a second overtime Wednesday — did not cause Orpik to experience concussion symptoms, he said.

Orpik said another part of his body hurt. His right shoulder and head appeared to hit the glass hard when Lucic caught him from behind in Game 4.

Small tweak

Coach Dan Bylsma only slightly altered his lineup, replacing Joe Vitale with Tyler Kennedy.

Bylsma had expressed satisfaction with many aspects of the Penguins' Game 3 performance — chances created and offensive-zone possession.

— Rob Rossi

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.